PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Environmental Research Letters16 citationsOpen Access

Global estimates of groundwater withdrawal trends and uncertainties

View Full Paper
SNSara NazariRRRobert ReineckeNMNils Moosdorf

Key Points

  • Average global groundwater withdrawal is 648 km³ a⁻¹, showing an uncertainty range of 465-881 km³ a⁻¹.
  • Agriculture accounts for half of all withdrawals, while domestic and industrial uses comprise 34.5% and 15.5%, respectively.
  • Monte Carlo simulations quantify uncertainties in groundwater estimates across various sectors and regions.
  • Increased withdrawal noted in 66% of IPCC WGI reference regions, with an overall annual increase of 0.5% from 2001 to 2020.

Abstract

Abstract Groundwater, Earth’s largest source of liquid freshwater, is essential for sustaining ecosystems and meeting societal demands. However, quantifying global groundwater withdrawals remains a significant challenge due to inherent uncertainties in input data, sectoral allocation assumptions, and model parameterization. In this study, we analyze global groundwater withdrawals from 2001 to 2020 using a newly developed data-driven Global Groundwater Withdrawal (GGW) model and quantify uncertainties through Monte Carlo simulations. The GGW model integrates reported country-level data with global grid-based datasets to estimate annual withdrawals across domestic, industrial, and agricultural sectors at a 0.1° resolution (≈ 10 km). Our results indicate an average global groundwater withdrawal of 648 km³ a⁻¹, with an uncertainty range of 465-881 km³ a⁻¹. Agriculture accounts for 50% of total withdrawals, followed by domestic use at 34.5% and industrial use at 15.5%. Temporal analysis shows increasing groundwater withdrawal in 66% of the 44 IPCC WGI reference regions over the 20 years, with a global average annual increase of 0.5% (varying regionally from 6.5% annual increase to 9% annual decrease). Comparison with previous studies highlights the impact of methodological choices and assumptions about groundwater withdrawal on the resulting global estimates. Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive uncertainty assessments and improved datasets. Expanding spatial coverage in underrepresented regions and enhancing temporal resolution, particularly for dynamic variables like irrigated areas, are crucial for more accurate groundwater withdrawal assessments. These improvements will enable better management and conservation of this vital resource in the face of growing global demands and climate change impacts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nazari et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1aab854b1d3bfb60e2a11https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adf6ca
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper