PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Engineering Reports3 citationsOpen Access

Fuzzy Ordinal Decision‐Making Method: A New Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making With Application to Circular Evaluation of Construction Projects

View Full Paper
FKFarzane KarimiHMHassan MinaSSShahryar Sorooshian

Key Points

  • FODM enhances decision making by effectively managing uncertainty and achieving consistency.
  • The method uses fewer pairwise comparisons than traditional methods, ensuring reliable outcomes.
  • A case study demonstrated its effectiveness in the circular evaluation of construction projects.
  • FODM outperforms existing fuzzy pairwise comparison methods in numerical evaluations.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Approaches that rely on pairwise comparisons frequently encounter challenges related to inconsistency and uncertainty in the complex realm of multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM), resulting in potential decision‐making errors. This article introduces the fuzzy ordinal decision‐making method (FODM) as a novel MCDM approach for addressing inconsistency and uncertainty concerns. This novel approach employs the concept of ordinal criteria comparison to effectively overcome the limitations inherent in conventional pairwise comparison methods and produces a more dependable and consistent decision‐making framework. Moreover, leveraging the power of fuzzy logic, FODM effectively manages uncertainties in decision processes. The results of our study indicate that FODM outperforms existing fuzzy pairwise comparison‐based MCDM methods, as evidenced by the evaluation of three distinct numerical examples. In addition, the efficiency of FODM is investigated through a case study in the field of circular evaluation of construction projects. When compared to other pairwise comparison methods, our method uses fewer pairwise comparisons, resulting in full consistency. This paper meaningfully contributes to the field of decision science by improving current approaches and laying the groundwork for more precise decision‐making procedures in future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karimi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ad5c54b1d3bfb60e5499https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70326
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Blockchain drivers to achieve sustainable food security in the Indian context2021 · 103 citations
  2. 2A hybrid MCDM-based FMEA model for identification of critical failure modes in manufacturing2020 · 113 citations
  3. 3A new multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals2018 · 213 citations
  4. 4Influencer marketing: service supplier selection2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5Developing critical success factors for integrating circular economy into modular construction projects in Hong Kong2021 · 157 citations