PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Oncolytic Therapies for Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

View Full Paper
OAOmar AlomarıHEHabiba EyvazovaBGBeyzanur Güney

Key Points

  • Oncolytic therapies have shown promise in treating glioblastoma, with efforts to enhance specificity and efficacy.
  • Clinical progress has been made with HSV-based therapies like G207, but challenges like immune evasion persist.
  • Combination strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy may improve outcomes but need validation.
  • Further research is essential to optimize delivery methods and understand the tumor’s immunosuppressive microenvironment.

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant brain tumors, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. Oncolytic treatments, particularly oncolytic viruses (OVs), have emerged as promising candidates by selectively infecting and lysing tumor cells while stimulating anti-tumor immunity. Various virus-based therapies are under investigation, including genetically engineered herpes simplex virus (HSV), adenovirus, poliovirus, reovirus, vaccinia virus, measles virus, and Newcastle disease virus, each exploiting unique tumor-selective mechanisms. While some, such as HSV-based therapies including G207 and DelytactTM, have demonstrated clinical progress, significant challenges persist, including immune evasion, heterogeneity in patient response, and delivery barriers due to the blood–brain barrier. Moreover, combination strategies integrating OVs with immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and radiation are promising but require further clinical validation. Non-viral oncolytic approaches, such as tumor-targeting bacteria and synthetic peptides, remain underexplored. This review highlights current advancements while addressing critical gaps in the literature, including the need for optimized delivery methods, better biomarker-based patient stratification, and a deeper understanding of GBM’s immunosuppressive microenvironment. Future research should focus on enhancing OV specificity, engineering viruses to deliver therapeutic genes, and integrating OVs with precision medicine strategies. By identifying these gaps, this review provides a framework for advancing oncolytic therapies in GBM treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alomarı et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ad6354b1d3bfb60e5b02https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152550
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Noninvasive therapy of brain cancer using a unique systemic delivery methodology with a cancer terminator virus2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Genetic Pathways to Glioblastoma2004 · 1,267 citations
  3. 3Double Recombinant Vaccinia Virus: A Candidate Drug against Human Glioblastoma2021 · 28 citations
  4. 4Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy2011 · 3,215 citations
  5. 5Translation of new cancer treatments from pet dogs to humans2008 · 670 citations