PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Surgical Endoscopy0 citationsOpen Access

5 mm versus 10 mm umbilical port during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do outcomes justify broader use in obese patients? A randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
IKIslam M. KorayemABAmr Saad BessaRHRao E Hassan

Key Points

  • Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced port-site hernia incidence to zero in the control group compared to six in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • Patients in the mini-laparoscopic group experienced significantly less postoperative pain and shorter operative time, leading to enhanced recovery.
  • Using a 5 mm umbilical port improved patient satisfaction and lowered analgesic requirements while noting surgeon satisfaction was less favorable with 5 mm telescopes.
  • The study included 240 obese patients with chronic calcular cholecystitis, affirming the feasibility of mini-laparoscopic techniques.

Abstract

Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) is proposed as a modification for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy to improve patient experience and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and outcomes of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using 5 mm umbilical port and telescope in obese patients who are at higher risk for developing port-site complications while factoring in surgeon's satisfaction. 240 obese patients with chronic calcular cholecystitis were randomly allocated to two groups, standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) group using 10 mm umbilical port, and MLC group using 5 mm one. The groups were analyzed for umbilical port-site hernia (PSH), postoperative pain, total operative time, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. There were no conversions from MLC to SLC. None of the patients in the MLC group experienced port-site hernia compared to 6 patients in the SLC group (P = 0.03). MLC group had shorter total operative time (46 vs 52 min, P = 0.005), less pain during the first 24 h postoperative (P < 0.001), and fewer in-hospital analgesic requirements (P < 0.001). Duration of postoperative analgesia at home was shorter in MLC group (P < 0.001) with earlier return of patients to normal daily activities compared to SLC group (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction and cosmesis were significantly higher among the MLC group (P < 0.001), however, surgeon satisfaction was inferior with the use of 5 mm telescopes compared to 10 mm ones (P = 0.06). Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy using 5 mm umbilical port and 5 mm telescope is safe and feasible among obese patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease. It offers shorter operative time, less postoperative pain and analgesic requirement, earlier return to normal daily activities, lower incidence of port-site hernia, and higher degree of patient satisfaction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Korayem et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b81854b1d3bfb60ec414https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12016-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Modified abdominal access for the obese population requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Our recommendation2025
  2. 2Modified abdominal access for the obese population requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Our recommendation2025
  3. 3Avoiding the Umbilical Incision in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Wound-Related Outcomes.2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Advantages of minilaparoscopic access in comparison with standard laparoscopic access during cholecystectomy2026
  5. 5Comparison of efficacy between modified transumbilical single-port and conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using inflammatory factors and serum amylase: An observational study.2026