PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 20251 citationsOpen Access

Relational AI and Consciousness Impressions: Ethical Frontiers for Designing Artificial Consciousness

View Full Paper
RCRolando CaleroGHGerardo Herrera

Key Points

  • The analysis suggests framing AI as a relational simulation platform can enhance human–AI interactions, fostering better understanding.
  • Foundational concepts from phenomenology and alterity shape the discourse, focusing on simulated empathy in AI systems.
  • Empirical findings from LLMs indicate relational simulations may provide ethically coherent pathways for AI development.
  • By exploring consciousness impressions, the research questions the necessity of pursuing autonomous machine consciousness.

Abstract

This article explores the intersection of artificial intelligence and consciousness through an integrated scientific and philosophical perspective. Advances in large language models (LLMs) and multimodal generative architectures, such as GPT-4, have intensified debates on whether artificial systems can transcend behavioral mimicry to approximate conscious awareness. Centered on the concept of imitation of the other, this study critically examines whether AI research should pursue the creation of self-aware systems or focus on developing simulations that generate convincing impressions of empathy and understanding to enhance human–AI interaction. Drawing on phenomenology and theories of alterity, the analysis argues that relational simulation—designing AI to ethically engage through simulated otherness—offers more sustainable and socially grounded benefits than the pursuit of autonomous machine consciousness. Empirical findings on simulated empathy in LLMs are integrated with current debates on AI alignment and machine ethics to define consciousness impressions as human interpretations of AI behavior. These results indicate that framing AI as a platform for relational simulation provides a practical and ethically coherent pathway for its development while serving as an experimental framework to probe the scientific and philosophical boundaries of mind, identity, and existence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Calero et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1bb6354b1d3bfb60ed080https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202507.2403.v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Empirical Evidence for AI Consciousness and the Risks of its Current Socialization2025
  2. 2The nature of consciousness in the context of artificial intelligence: Redefining human-technology relationships2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3The prospect and metaphysical analysis of conscious artificial intelligence2024
  4. 4Digital Selves and Synthetic Souls: Revisiting Consciousness, Moral Standing and Personhood2026
  5. 5Simulated Souls: Investigating the Emotional Fallacy in Large Language Models2025