PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 20250 citationsOpen Access

A Hybrid Workflow for Auricular Epithesis: Proof of Concept Integrating Mold Design and the Virtual Patient

View Full Paper
CTCristian Ioan TarbaIDIoana DragomirIBIoana Medeea Baciu

Key Points

  • The study demonstrates the feasibility of a digital workflow for creating auricular epitheses, achieving high patient satisfaction.
  • Results show that CATIA-derived prostheses scored 9.22/10 in patient assessments, outperforming those made with Blender, which scored 7.67/10.
  • Molds were reused five times without damage, illustrating their durability and effectiveness within the manufacturing process.
  • The integration of virtual patient models and mold design enhances reproducibility and accessibility of custom prosthetics, benefiting patient outcomes.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Auricular epitheses play a vital role in restoring facial symmetry and patient confidence following congenital or acquired defects. Traditional wax-based fabrication is labor-intensive and lacks reproducibility. This study proposes and evaluates a simplified, digitally driven workflow for auricular prosthesis manufacturing, integrating virtual patient creation, mirrored ear design, and three-part mold fabrication using two design platforms—CATIA V5R21 (industrial CAD) and Blender (open-source graphics software). Key outcomes include mold reusability, patient-centered evaluation, and workflow feasibility; Methods: A 28-year-old female patient with right-sided microtia was selected. A light-based 3D facial scan was performed, and the intact contralateral ear was mirrored and adapted virtually to the defect site. Molds were designed in both CATIA and Blender using a standardized three-parallelepiped approach and printed using FDM technology (Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus). Five silicone epitheses were fabricated with each mold. Surface trueness was evaluated with Geomagic Control X, while subjective assessments were conducted by an independent prosthetic team and the patient using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS); Results: Both design workflows resulted in clinically usable prostheses. No statistically significant difference in RMS deviation was observed (p = 0.53), although CATIA-derived epitheses achieved higher subjective scores (mean 9.22/10) compared to Blender (mean 7.67/10). The preferred prosthesis (CATIA #4) was selected for final pigmentation and delivery. All molds were reused five times without structural damage; Conclusions: This study demonstrates that both CATIA and Blender can support an effective, patient-centered digital workflow for auricular prosthesis fabrication. The methodology enables reproducibility, mold reusability, and improved clinical accessibility of custom prosthetics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tarba et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1c31b54b1d3bfb60f098fhttps://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.0650.v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Hybrid Workflow for Auricular Epithesis: Proof of Concept Integrating Mold Design and the Virtual Patient2025
  2. 2Tablet-based Augmented reality and 3D printed templates in fully guided Microtia Reconstruction: a clinical workflow2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Fabrication of Implant-Supported Auricular Prosthesis Using Artificial Intelligence2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Custom prosthetic rehabilitation of ocular defects with a digital workflow2026
  5. 5Comparison of trueness and repeatability of facial prosthesis design using a 3D morphable model approach, traditional computer-aided design methods, and conventional manual sculpting techniques2024 · 4 citations