PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research0 citations

Linguoculturological And Linguopragmatic Features of Gender Role Formation in Children’s Speech: A Comparative Study of Uzbek And English

View Full Paper
SQShokirova Diloromxon Abduvali qizi

Key Points

  • Uzbek children's discourse shows more rigid gender distinctions, reinforcing cultural norms and expectations.
  • English children exhibit egalitarian language use, particularly in directive speech acts and humor with peers.
  • Discourse analysis of children's everyday dialogues reveals how cultural ideals influence conversational strategies.
  • Pragmatic differences between boys and girls highlight varied constructions of power, cooperation, and communicative intent.

Abstract

This paper examines the linguoculturological and linguopragmatic peculiarities of gender role formation in children’s speech in Uzbek and English, focusing on the intersection of language, culture, and communicative intent. Drawing on the theoretical basis outlined in Shokirova Dilorom’s dissertation, this study identifies and compares how cultural norms and pragmatic strategies shape children's use of language according to gender. The research highlights that gender-specific discourse emerges early in children’s communication and is reinforced through linguistic input, narrative structures, and culturally encoded expectations. Methodologically, the study employs discourse analysis of folklore, literary texts, and children’s everyday dialogues to trace patterns of gendered language. It also incorporates pragmatic theory (Grice’s maxims, speech act theory) and cultural-linguistic frameworks (Wierzbicka, Lakoff, Vezhbitskaya). Findings indicate that Uzbek child discourse tends to preserve more rigid gender distinctions, particularly in cultural metaphors, role-based expressions, and politeness strategies, while English child discourse reveals more egalitarian tendencies, especially in directive speech acts and humor use. Pragmatically, boys and girls differ in how they construct conversational implicatures, assert power, or signal cooperation—shaped by cultural ideals of masculinity and femininity. The article concludes that both linguocultural and pragmatic mechanisms contribute to the early reproduction of gender roles, reinforcing social norms through language. The findings have implications for cross-cultural pragmatics, child language acquisition, and gender studies in linguistics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shokirova Diloromxon Abduvali qizi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1c32754b1d3bfb60f1054https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/volume05issue07-31
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper