PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology0 citationsOpen Access

Accelerated vs Step-Up Endoscopic Treatment for Pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ACCELERATE)

View Full Paper
OGOlsen GaSPSchmidt PNAHAbdul Hadi

Key Points

  • Accelerated treatment protocol reduced major complications to 0% compared to 46.2% in the step-up group.
  • Length of stay in hospital was significantly shorter at 32.5 days in the accelerated group versus 68.5 days in the step-up group.
  • The primary composite outcome occurred in only 8.3% of patients in the accelerated group, compared to 61.5% in the step-up group.
  • The trial underscores the benefits of adopting accelerated treatment for managing large pancreatic walled-off necrosis cases.

Abstract

Endoscopic step-up treatment with ultrasound-guided drainage and necrosectomy has become the gold standard treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON); however, the length of stay (LOS) in hospital of patients with large WON remains substantial. We hypothesized that an accelerated treatment protocol could reduce LOS and major complications in patients with large WON. This single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary care facility in Denmark included patients with WON >15 cm, randomized to either an accelerated or step-up treatment approach. In the accelerated group, necrosectomy was performed during the index procedure and repeated as needed. In the step-up group, necrosectomy was only performed in cases without clinical improvement. The primary composite endpoints were death, major complications, and LOS >58 days. The trial, which was prematurely terminated due to concerns of the safety of the patients in the step-up group based on a benefit-to-risk assessment, included 25 patients (12 accelerated, 13 step-up). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The primary composite outcome occurred in 8.3% of patients in the accelerated group versus 61.5% in the step-up group (absolute risk reduction 53.5%, RR 0.14; p=0.011). Major complications occurred less frequently in the accelerated group (0.0% vs. 46.2%; p=0.015), and median LOS was shorter (32.5 days Q1-Q3: 17.5-38.2 vs. 68.5 days Q1-Q3: 35.5-97.8; p=0.039). An accelerated treatment protocol may significantly reduce the risk of major complications, the LOS, and the inflammatory burden compared to a step-up approach, suggesting its adoption in treatment large WON. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT05601687).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ga et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1c9dd54b1d3bfb60f3165https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.08.007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Endoscopic Step‐up Approach for Walled‐off Necrosis After Acute Pancreatitis2025
  2. 2Immediate versus Step-Up Endoscopic Necrosectomy after EUS-Guided Drainage of Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials2026
  3. 3Interdisciplinary Step-Up Strategy for Infected Pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis: Sinus Tract Endoscopic Necrosectomy (STEN) Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Necrosectomy (LAPN)2026
  4. 4Top-down versus step-up approach after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of infected walled-off necrosis: a randomized controlled trial2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Immediate vs Step-up Endoscopic Transluminal Necrosectomy in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials2026