PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025npj Digital Medicine18 citationsOpen Access

Culture-free detection of bacteria from blood for rapid sepsis diagnosis

View Full Paper
MMMónica MiguélezMOMohammad OsaidEHErik Hallström

Key Points

  • Rapid detection of bacteria improves treatment outcomes in sepsis patients, potentially saving lives.
  • Detection achieved within 2 hours for E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and E. faecalis at low concentrations.
  • Methodology includes smart centrifugation followed by microfluidic trapping and deep learning analysis.
  • Significant advancement towards timely and culture-free detection of bloodstream infections.

Abstract

Abstract Approximately 50 million people suffer from sepsis yearly, and 13 million die from it. For every hour a patient with septic shock is untreated, their survival rate decreases by 8%. Therefore, rapid detection and antibiotic susceptibility profiling of bacterial agents in the blood of sepsis patients are crucial for determining appropriate treatment. Here, we introduce a method to isolate bacteria from whole blood with high separation efficiency through Smart centrifugation , followed by microfluidic trapping and subsequent detection using deep learning applied to microscopy images. We detected, within 2 h, E. coli , K. pneumoniae , or E. faecalis from spiked samples of healthy human donor blood at clinically relevant concentrations as low as 9, 7 and 32 colony-forming units per ml of blood, respectively. However, the detection of S. aureus remains a challenge. This rapid isolation and detection represents a significant advancement towards culture-free detection of bloodstream infections.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miguélez et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d03e54b1d3bfb60f6fe1https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01948-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)2016 · 28,811 citations
  2. 2Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision2016 · 31,518 citations
  3. 3Update on blood cultures: how to obtain, process, report, and interpret2013 · 224 citations
  4. 4Predicting Bacteremia in Patients with Sepsis Syndrome1997 · 214 citations
  5. 5Using buoyant mass to measure the growth of single cells2010 · 411 citations