PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025International Endodontic Journal1 citationsOpen Access

The “Testing Effect” in Undergraduate Endodontic Education: The Impact of Regular Low Stakes Testing on Learning Outcomes and Student Engagement

View Full Paper
MKM. KalyvaKKKaterina KavvadiaLLLoucas Τ. Louca

Key Points

  • Students scored significantly higher on tested material compared to non-tested material, demonstrating the power of retrieval practice.
  • The average exam score for tested material was 25.3, while non-tested material scored 21.1, indicating a strong positive impact of testing.
  • With a within-participants experimental design, 81 dental students experienced structured low-stakes testing across multiple lectures.
  • The findings support the integration of testing in dental curricula, suggesting enhanced learning and engagement among students.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim This study investigates the impact of regular testing on learning outcomes in undergraduate endodontic education. Specifically, it examines whether students perform better at the end of the course on previously tested material compared to non‐tested material and explores the role of students' engagement and perceptions of testing in this effect. Methodology A within‐participants experimental design was employed with 81 third‐year dental students enrolled in a preclinical endodontics course. Students were tested on half of the course lectures (tested material) immediately after each lecture, while the remaining lectures served as a control (non‐tested material). Testing was conducted using multiple‐choice questions on the Blackboard Learn platform with immediate automated feedback. Final exam scores for tested and non‐tested material were compared, and a subset of students ( n = 44) completed a questionnaire assessing cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, and perceptions of testing. Results Students scored significantly higher on tested material (Mean = 25.284, SD = 4.202) compared to non‐tested material (Mean = 21.111, SD = 3.847). The mean difference between the two scores was statistically significant with a very large effect size ( F 1,80 = 108.329, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.575). The difference remained significant with a moderate to large effect size after accounting for the grade in the previous course and sex ( F 1,78 = 9.392, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.107). Emotional engagement was found to moderate the effectiveness of testing, with students reporting higher emotional engagement showing greater gains from the intervention. Conclusions The findings demonstrate a robust testing effect in undergraduate endodontic education, supporting the hypothesis that retrieval practice enhances learning outcomes. These results suggest that integrating regular, low‐stakes testing into dental curricula can enhance dental students' learning outcomes at the end of the course.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kalyva et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d60654b1d3bfb60f9841https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of the Effects of Requirement-Based and Test-Based Formative Assessment Methods on Pre-Clinical Endodontic Competence and Performance of Dental Students2024
  2. 2Developing and Evaluating the Effect of an Educational Multimedia on Clinical Awareness of Students in Clinical Endodontics2025
  3. 3Gamification in endodontic education: a pilot study on student engagement and perceived learning outcomes2025
  4. 4From theory to clinical practice: a single-centre cross-sectional analysis of dental students’ knowledge of contemporary endodontic materials and techniques2026
  5. 5The application of interdisciplinary and cross‐grade learning teaching method in stomatology course2024 · 3 citations