PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Clinical Cardiology1 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence of Pulmonary Hypertension in Individuals With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
MKMaaedah KhanRSRhea SuribhatlaJSJohn Spencer

Key Points

  • The overall prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in heart failure patients is 46.6%.
  • Subgroup analyses show that the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension varies based on diagnostic methods used.
  • Prospective studies suggest higher prevalence rates compared to retrospective studies, indicating variability in findings.
  • Standardized methods in future research are necessary to enhance the accuracy of prevalence estimates.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalizations worldwide. HF can lead to pulmonary hypertension (PH) and co‐occurrence of HF and PH is associated with a poor prognosis. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aim to estimate the prevalence of PH in patients with HF. Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies reporting the prevalence of PH amongst HF patients. A meta‐analysis of PH prevalence, including subgroup analyses, was conducted using a random‐effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta‐regressions by comorbidities and patient characteristics were done. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. Results Fifty‐four papers with 259 665 HF patients were included, of which 46 004 also had PH. The overall PH prevalence estimate in individuals with HF is 46.6% (95% CI: 39.6%–53.7%). Prevalence varied by diagnostic method, with studies using right heart catheterization reporting the highest estimates (62.5%; 52.0%–72.0%), hospital recorded data the lowest (18.4%; 14.4%–23.3%), and echocardiography 45.7% (37.1%–54.6%). Prevalence was higher in HF with preserved (47.2%; 34.8%–60.0%) than reduced ejection fraction (35.7%; 22.6%–51.3%). Prospective studies show higher estimates (60.1%; 50.7%–68.8%) than retrospective studies (37.3%; 29.5%–45.9%). Conclusions This is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis investigating the prevalence of PH in HF patients and shows that the prevalence of PH in this patient population is strikingly high. There is notable variability in estimates reported by different studies, largely attributed to differences in the diagnostic method of PH. Future studies with robust, standardized methodologies are needed to estimate prevalence more accurately.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1d7e354b1d3bfb60f9ab5https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70197
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper