PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Cancer Nanotechnology27 citationsOpen Access

Regulation of oxidative stress and inflammation caused by drug accumulation in the TME based on EPR-passive strategy and active targeting

View Full Paper
XDXiang DengZZZhongsong ZhangTRTao Ren

Key Points

  • Nanomaterial accumulation in solid tumors can be enhanced by using both passive and active targeting mechanisms.
  • Employing passive strategies alongside TME modulation can significantly improve EPR effect-driven delivery of nanomaterials.
  • Active targeting methods, such as ligand-directed and aptamer-based approaches, enhance the specificity and uptake of nanomaterials.
  • The insights from this review can guide the development of more effective nanomaterials for cancer treatment and improve clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Despite significant advancements in nanomaterials for cancer therapy, the clinical translation of cancer nanomedicine remains greatly hindered by insufficient accumulation of these nanomaterials within solid tumors—a critical bottleneck underlying the high failure rates observed in clinical trials. Our review systematically analyzes the mechanisms governing nanomaterial delivery to solid tumors, extending beyond the foundational Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect. We critically evaluate passive strategies leveraging physicochemical properties (size switching, charge reversal) and tumor microenvironment (TME) modulation to amplify EPR-dependent delivery. Furthermore, we dissect active targeting paradigms—including ligand-directed, aptamer-based, and cell-mediated strategies, which exploit the distinct molecular and cellular characteristics of solid tumors to improve nanomaterial specificity and cellular uptake. Crucially, we highlight the bidirectional relationship between nanomedicine accumulation and TME dynamics, alongside the associated cytotoxic consequences. The review emphasizes the paradigm shift toward "passive–active" dual-targeting strategies and emerging technologies designed to overcome sequential physiological barriers. By integrating fundamental transport mechanisms, therapeutic efficacy, and toxicity profiles, this review offers a comprehensive framework for the rational design of next-generation nanomaterials with enhanced solid tumor accumulation and clinical applicability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deng et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1dda254b1d3bfb60fc7fbhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-025-00342-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The EPR effect in human tumors: a critical re-evaluation of a nanomedicine dogma and a call for new targeting paradigms2026 · 3 citations
  2. 2Transport of Engineered Nanoparticles in Solid Tumors: Mechanistic Barriers and Emerging Delivery Strategies2026
  3. 3Self-reinforcing nanomedicine orchestrates EPR effect and neutrophil hitchhiking for spatiotemporal accumulation in solid tumors2025
  4. 4Nanomedicine Reimagined: Translational Strategies for Precision Tumor Theranostics.2025 · 20 citations
  5. 5Tumor microenvironment–specific nanomedicine: from biology-driven to multi-omics–guided precision engineering2026 · 1 citations