PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Science & Society0 citations

Lenin's The State and Revolution: An Innocent Reading

View Full Paper
JTJules Townshend

Key Points

  • A critical defense of Lenin challenges Polan's Weberian-inspired critique.
  • The argument explores what type of Marxism can address modernity and democratic expansion.
  • A synthesis of Marxist and Weberian thought may be needed to surpass liberal democracy.
  • The paper questions the applicable political frameworks in contemporary discourse.

Abstract

A. J. Polan's Weberian-inspired and seemingly persuasive critique of Lenin in Lenin and the End of Politics has gone unanswered. In the process of refuting Polan a critical defense of Lenin is offered. The general question is raised about what kind of Marxism is needed in the face of modernity in order to broaden the horizon of democratic possibility. This requires some kind of Marxist-Weberian synthesis that goes beyond liberal democracy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jules Townshend (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1e30854b1d3bfb6100a4bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/003682379906300104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Class Politics and the State: Lenin and the Contradictions of Socialism1995 · 1 citations
  2. 2Lenin on the State1995 · 2 citations
  3. 3Anarchism and anarcho-syndicalism1972 · 39 citations
  4. 4Marx and the Division of Labour1982 · 64 citations
  5. 5The Political Ideas of Marx and Engels1974 · 67 citations