PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Deleted Journal0 citations

Materials for The Study of Kejaman-Sekapan Oral Tradition (Chapter 9: Notes to the prose narrative)

View Full Paper
SSS. S. Strickland

Key Points

  • The study explores lexical variability in the Kejaman oral tradition, focusing on non-Kejaman terms.
  • Notably, terms from Kenyah and Sebop are prevalent, despite the story's claim to focus on Sambup.
  • The analysis aims for consistency in orthography despite pronunciation variations across the narrative.
  • This examination emphasizes the importance of understanding lexical items for accurate narrative translation.

Abstract

Non-Kejaman (K) words in the text are principally Kenyah (Kny) and Sebop (Sb). This is despite the claim that the story concerns a people called the Sambup (see Maxwell, 1990, for a discussion and sample vocabulary of this group). Such lexical items are discussed here in an attempt to explicate the translation of the text. It is important to note that there was considerable variability in pronunciation of what, according to context, were 'the same' lexical items; nevertheless, as with the sung narrative,an attempt has been made to ensure general consistency in orthography. The numbers cross-refer to the numbered paragraphs of the text; and these are subdivided by phrases in bold form for discussion in the notes. As a variety of languages is used in this narrative, bracketed forms represent broad phonological transcriptions where a well-argued phonemic transcription has not been devised. In contrast to the narrative translation in Chapter 8, the English glosses here generally use the present tense where aspect is uncompleted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

S. S. Strickland (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1e30854b1d3bfb6100b7fhttps://doi.org/10.61507/smj22-1995-2xcs-09
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper