PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025JUSTISIOpen Access

Comparison of the Principle of Meaningful Participation in the Process of Law Formation in Indonesia, Switzerland, and Sweden

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GSGeofani Milthree SaragihRPRengga Kusuma PutraAIAde Sathya Sanathana Ishwara

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Normative juridical analysis compares the principle of meaningful participation in law-making in Indonesia, Switzerland, and Sweden, suggesting gaps and best practices.

Key Points

  • Indonesia faces significant challenges in ensuring substantial public participation in law formation.
  • Results indicate that Switzerland's direct democracy and Sweden's structured consultations enhance public participation.
  • The study employs a normative juridical method with a literature review and comparative law approach.
  • Future prospects for public participation in Indonesia appear positive, driven by transparency and technology.

Cite This Study

Saragih et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a1d31b076d99fa52f4ahttps://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i3.4346
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Testing the implementation of “meaningful participation” as an operational concept in lawmaking: Indonesia’s extractive regulations case2026
  2. 2The Urgency of Implementing Meaningful Participation in Forming Laws in Indonesia2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION AS A GUARANTEE OF CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE FORMATION OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Exposing Discrepancies in Indonesia's Legislative Processes2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5THE CONCEPT OF E-PARLIAMENT: STRENGTHENING MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION IN LAWMAKING IN INDONESIA2024