PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology2 citationsOpen Access

Exploring Development Methods for Reactive Synthesis Specifications

View Full Paper
DMDor Ma’ayanSMShahar MaozJRJan Oliver Ringert

Key Points

  • Modular specification development enhances planning and debugging efficiency, leading to faster synthesis times.
  • Incremental development methods were found to facilitate easier validation of specifications during the process.
  • Mixed-method analysis highlighted the significance of both methods in the context of reactive synthesis specifications.
  • Participants reported fewer unrealizability issues when using modular methods compared to incremental approaches.

Abstract

Reactive synthesis is an automated procedure to obtain a correct-by-construction reactive system from its temporal logic specification. Despite significant research progress in the past decades, reactive synthesis is still in early-stage of use. Previous studies found that the lack of development methods for reactive synthesis specifications is one barrier to its wider adoption. In this paper, we adapt two development methods, an incremental method and a modular method, to the context of reactive synthesis specifications. The methods are based on existing software development methods on the one hand and studies about reactive synthesis on the other hand. Then, we report on an exploratory case study in which participants developed specifications using the two methods. We evaluated the methods using a mixed-method analysis that combines grounded theory analysis of Slack communication with participants, quantitative exploratory data analysis of the synthesis IDE usage logs, and qualitative independent expert review of the final specifications. Our findings show clear benefits of modular specification development in terms of ease of planning, synthesis time, fewer unrealizability issues, and faster debugging. However, the incremental development method was more natural and easy to use, and specifications developed incrementally were also easier to validate during the development process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma’ayan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a3031b076d99fa53318https://doi.org/10.1145/3767159
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper