PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025eLife0 citationsOpen Access

Mining the neuroimaging literature

View Full Paper
JDJérôme DockèsKOKendra OudykMTMohammad Torabi

Key Points

  • Automated tools enhance the analysis of biomedical literature, simplifying data extraction and processing.
  • The command-line tool for downloading articles from PubMed Central streamlines access to extensive literature records.
  • A lightweight annotation application increases accuracy in extracting complex information for automated analyses.
  • Repositories for sharing analysis code and annotations improve the reproducibility of text mining projects.

Abstract

Automated analysis of the biomedical literature ( literature mining ) offers a rich source of insights. However, such analysis requires collecting a large number of articles and extracting and processing their content. This task is often prohibitively difficult and time-consuming. Here, we provide tools to easily collect, process, and annotate the biomedical literature. In particular, https://neuroquery.github.io/pubget/pubget.html is an efficient and reliable command-line tool for downloading articles in bulk from PubMed Central, extracting their contents and metadata into convenient formats, and extracting and analyzing information such as stereotactic brain coordinates. https://jeromedockes.github.io/labelbuddy/labelbuddy/current/ is a lightweight local application for annotating text, which facilitates the extraction of complex information or the creation of ground-truth labels to validate automated information extraction methods. Further, we describe repositories where researchers can share their analysis code and their manual annotations in a format that facilitates reuse. These resources can help streamline text mining and meta-science projects and make text mining of the biomedical literature more accessible, effective, and reproducible. We describe a typical workflow based on these tools and illustrate it with several example projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dockès et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a3731b076d99fa5349ehttps://doi.org/10.7554/elife.94909.2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 11,851 citations
  2. 2141. Neurosynth Compose: A Free an Open Platform for Precise Large-Scale Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis2024 · 13 citations
  3. 3Trade talk: Cell negotiator2016 · 8 citations
  4. 4Living Systematic Reviews2021 · 57 citations
  5. 5Potential Reporting Bias in fMRI Studies of the Brain2013 · 138 citations