PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025World Electric Vehicle Journal3 citationsOpen Access

Railway Fastener Defect Detection Model Based on Dual Attention and MobileNetv3

View Full Paper
DLDefang LvJMJianjun MengGMGaoyang Meng

Key Points

  • The proposed model achieves 96.5% mean Average Precision (mAP) in detecting rail fasteners.
  • With an improved inference speed of 17.9 frames per second (FPS), the model performs better than traditional inspections.
  • A novel dual-attention mechanism combining Squeeze-and-Excitation and Coordinate Attention enhances detection performance.
  • Using SIoU loss function accelerates the training convergence rate compared to the original CIoU loss.

Abstract

Defect detection in rail fasteners constitutes a fundamental requirement for ensuring safe and reliable railway operations. Confronted with increasingly demanding inspection requirements of modern rail networks, traditional manual visual inspection methods have proven inadequate. To achieve accurate, efficient, and intelligent detection of rail fasteners, this paper presents an enhanced YOLOv5m-based defect detection model. Firstly, a dual-attention mechanism comprising Squeeze-and-Excitation and Coordinate Attention modules is employed to enhance the model. Secondly, the network architecture is redesigned by adopting MobileNetv3 as the backbone while incorporating structures with Ghost Shuffle Convolution (GSConv) modules and lightweight upsampling operators to reduce computational overhead. Finally, the original CIoU loss function in YOLOv5 is replaced with SIoU to accelerate convergence rate during training. Experimental results on a custom-built rail fastener dataset comprising 6500 images demonstrate that the enhanced model achieves 96.5% mAP and 17.9 FPS, surpassing the baseline by 3.1% and 2.1 FPS, respectively. Compared to existing detection models, this solution exhibits higher accuracy, faster inference, and lower memory consumption, providing critical technical support for edge deployment of rail fastener defect detection systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a4031b076d99fa53812https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16090513
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A rail fastener defect detection algorithm based on improved YOLOv52024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Lightweight Algorithm for Rail Fastener Status Detection Based on YOLOv8n2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3An Improved Target Network Model for Rail Surface Defect Detection2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Research on Track Defect Visual Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOv7-tiny2025
  5. 5A lightweight YOLOv8n-based method for rail surface defect detection in complex railway environments2026