PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025Noise and Health1 citationsOpen Access

Dose–Response Relationship Between Aircraft Noise Exposure and Community Annoyance: A Case Study of Hangzhou Xiaoshan International Airport

View Full Paper
JLJunwei LvYCY. ChenMYMo Yang

Key Points

  • Community annoyance from aircraft noise increased by seven percentage points, reflecting a steeper dose–response curve.
  • Older residents reported significantly higher annoyance levels, with statistical analyses supporting this demographic difference.
  • Noise exposure measured using sound level meters and analyzed through quadratic polynomial regression effectively depicted the annoyance relationship.
  • Findings highlight cultural differences in noise perception, emphasizing the need for tailored noise management strategies.

Abstract

Objective: With increasing air traffic, aircraft noise pollution near Hangzhou Xiaoshan International Airport has intensified, raising concerns about community annoyance. Compared with a 2012 study, community responses to aircraft noise may have evolved, necessitating an updated dose–response relationship. This study refines the dose–response relationship, investigates the influence of demographic factors (age and gender) on annoyance, and contextualizes findings within international comparisons. Methods: A face-to-face survey of 450 residents near Hangzhou Xiaoshan International Airport was conducted using the International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise standard questionnaire to assess noise annoyance. Noise levels were measured with a multifunctional sound level meter, and statistical analyses, including quadratic polynomial regression, Kruskal–Wallis H tests, and Spearman rank correlation, were applied to investigate the relationship between noise exposure and annoyance. Results: The proportion of highly annoyed residents increased by seven percentage points at the same noise exposure levels ( L den 61–72 dB) compared with 2012, reflecting a steeper dose–response curve. Older residents exhibited higher annoyance levels than younger individuals (Kruskal–Wallis H test: H = 32.390, P < 0.001), whereas gender differences were not statistically significant (Mann–Whitney U test: Z = −0.877, P = 0.380). Compared with European studies, Chinese residents reported higher annoyance at the same noise levels, likely influenced by cultural contexts, policy transparency, and urban infrastructure differences. Conclusion: This study provides updated empirical evidence on annoyance responses to aircraft noise, offering refined dose–response data and demographic insights. The findings serve as a scientific basis for policymakers to improve residential noise insulation, enhance compensation transparency, and establish structured community engagement mechanisms, contributing to more effective noise management strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a4731b076d99fa53f2bhttps://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_1_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Advancing noise management in aviation: Strategic approaches for preventing noise-induced hearing loss2024 · 26 citations
  2. 2Effect of age-related extended high frequency hearing loss on the subjective impressions of dental drill noise2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Measuring Community Response to Noise—Factors Affecting the Results of Annoyance Surveys2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Transportation Noise Pollution and Cardiovascular Health2024 · 131 citations
  5. 5The influence of personality traits and gender on noise annoyance in laboratory studies2019 · 44 citations