PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025The Astrophysical Journal Letters6 citationsOpen Access

Explaining the Weak Evolution of the High-redshift Mass–Metallicity Relation with Galaxy Burst Cycles

View Full Paper
AMAndrew MarszewskiCFClaude‐André Faucher‐GiguèreRFRobert Feldmann

Key Points

  • The mass–metallicity relation remains nearly constant at high redshift, particularly at z ≳ 5.
  • Simulations identify stellar feedback and burst cycles as key drivers of the mass–metallicity relation evolution.
  • The study presents a reduced burst model that captures the dynamics of gas recycling in high-redshift galaxies.
  • Findings suggest a lowered metallicity at higher star formation rates, contributing to our understanding of cosmic chemical evolution.

Abstract

Abstract Recent observations suggest a nearly constant gas-phase mass–metallicity relation (MZR) at z ≳ 5, in agreement with many theoretical predictions. This lack of evolution contrasts with observations at z ≲ 3, which find an increasing normalization of the MZR with decreasing redshift. We analyze a high-redshift suite of FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulations to identify the physical drivers of the MZR. Previous studies have explained the weak evolution of the high-redshift MZR in terms of weakly evolving or saturated gas fractions, but we find that this alone does not explain the evolution in FIRE-2. Instead, stellar feedback following intense bursts of star formation drives enriched gas out of galaxies, resetting their interstellar medium and separating their histories into distinct “burst cycles.” We develop the “reduced burst model,” a simplified gas-regulator model that successfully reproduces the simulated MZR and identifies the dominant drivers of its evolution. As redshift decreases, the metallicity of inflows within burst cycles increases at fixed stellar mass due to increased wind recycling of enriched gas. Meanwhile, the metal mass produced by stars per inflowing gas mass within these cycles decreases because of decreased star formation per gas mass inflowing into the galaxy. The effects of these two processes on the median metallicity largely cancel, holding the MZR constant for z = 5–12. At fixed stellar mass, the simulations predict lower gas metallicities at higher H α -derived star formation rates, in qualitative agreement with the fundamental metallicity relation, but this effect is reduced in rest UV-selected samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marszewski et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44b2a31b076d99fa5430bhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adf74b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A recently quenched galaxy 700 million years after the Big Bang2024 · 117 citations
  2. 2Unveiling the Cosmic Chemistry: Revisiting the Mass–Metallicity Relation with JWST/NIRSpec at 4 < z < 102025 · 36 citations
  3. 3On the variation of the initial mass function2001 · 7,624 citations
  4. 4JWST Census for the Mass–Metallicity Star Formation Relations at z = 4–10 with Self-consistent Flux Calibration and Proper Metallicity Calibrators2023 · 285 citations
  5. 5Characterizing mass, momentum, energy, and metal outflow rates of multiphase galactic winds in the FIRE-2 cosmological simulations2021 · 151 citations