PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025University of Zawia journal of engineering sciences and technology.2 citations

Numerical Study of Turbulent Flow Aerodynamics Around a Multi-Element Airfoil

View Full Paper
EOElhassen Ali Ahmed OmerAAAli Ali Khalifa AlkharboushiZAZ Bendimerad Ahmed

Key Points

  • The study finds that multi-element airfoils improve aerodynamic performance under various conditions.
  • Results show a maximum lift coefficient of 3.81 for specific slat and flap configurations tested.
  • The numerical simulation utilized the SST k-ω turbulence model and was executed in ANSYS Fluent.
  • Findings suggest optimal slat and flap positioning can enhance lift while managing drag.

Abstract

Multi-element airfoils are high-lift devices and provide improved aerodynamic characteristics, which are beneficial for several applications. The performance of high lift devices was investigated numerically by adapting the 2D viscous, steady, pressure model equations together with the SST k-ω turbulence model. Simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent 24 for the NHLP2D airfoil with a leading edge slat and trailing edge flap. The flow is considered at a Reynolds number of 1.6x105 and varying angles of attack from 0 to 28 deg. The parameters that describe the positioning of the slat and flap were tested variables. These variables include deflection angles, gaps, and overlaps. The lift and drag coefficients are evaluated for various configurations. The results reveal that slats increase the maximum lift on the wing and delay stall, increasing the maximum angle of attack. However, they reduce the lift. In contrast, the flaps increase the overall high-lift configuration airfoil camber, thereby increasing lift. It was found that for the tested slats and flaps locations, slats with a 2.6% gap, -1.5% overlap and 30° deflection, and flap with a 1.3% gap, 5.3% overlap and 30° deflection was the one with the most favorable performance, generating a Clmax of 3.81 and Cd of 0.158.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Omer et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44b3031b076d99fa5473dhttps://doi.org/10.26629/uzjest.2025.03
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Numerical Study on Single and Multi-Element NACA 43018 Wing Airfoil with Leading-Edge Slat and Slotted Flap2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2A Numerical Analysis of NACA 0015 Airfoil with Different Types of Flaps2025
  3. 3Simulation of Various Angles of Attack of NACA 23012 Airfoil Using CFD2026
  4. 4Numerical Observation Of Aerodynamic Characteristics Of A Biconvex Airfoil At Supersonic Flow2025
  5. 5Evaluation of Flow Models According to Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 4412 Airfoil2026