PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025Russia society politics history0 citationsOpen Access

Social Conditions of Russian Federation New Federal Subjects Residents in Special Military Operation Conditions

View Full Paper
ВКВ. В. Комлева

Key Points

  • Residents in the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics face complex social conditions due to the Special Military Operation, which alters their public consciousness.
  • Field research and political rhetoric analysis reveal fragmented identities and risks of dependent subjectivity among the populations in these regions.
  • The study emphasizes the importance of archetypes like the hero-defender and motherland in shaping regional subjectivity and collective adaptation.
  • Cultural and psychological efforts are essential to help these regions integrate into the Russian Federation while addressing traumatic uncertainty.

Abstract

The article examines the social conditions in the territories of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, as well as the Zaporozhie and Kherson oblasts, in the context of the Special Military Operation (SMO) and the process of integration into the Russian Federation. The focus is on the transformation of public consciousness and the collective unconscious of the residents in these regions. The author relies on field research, political rhetoric analysis of regional leaders, and secondary analysis of similar studies by other researchers. The complex conditions of social and political transition are highlighted, along with the risks of emerging societal states such as borderline social reality, fragmented identity, and dependent subjectivity. The images and archetypes forming in Russia’s liberated territories are analyzed, with particular attention to the blurring boundary between war and everyday life phenomenon, which contributes to anxiety condition among the population. Archetypal structures - such as the image of the hero-defender, the suffering homeland, the motherland, and civilizational unity with Russia—play a crucial role in collective adaptation and regional subjectivity. It is stated that while all four regions share a set of common, foundational experiences and archetypes, they differ in the depth of their entrenchment and the ways how these archetypes are actualized. The conclusion is drawn on the necessity for cultural, educational, and psychological efforts that would be aimed at integrating the population and overcoming condition of traumatic uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

В. В. Комлева (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44c4d31b076d99fa55e14https://doi.org/10.56654/ropi-2025-3(16)-126-145
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper