PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Journal of Imaging0 citationsOpen Access

Segment and Recover: Defending Object Detectors Against Adversarial Patch Attacks

View Full Paper
HGHaotian GuHJHamidreza Jafarnejadsani

Key Points

  • SAR effectively improves the resilience of object detectors against adversarial patch attacks, enhancing reliability.
  • The patch-agnostic detection frontend successfully localizes adversarial patches, ensuring robustness in dynamic settings.
  • Our evaluations show SAR is compatible with various pretrained object detectors, indicating broad applicability.
  • Comprehensive tests reveal SAR outperforms state-of-the-art methods against diverse adversarial patch types.

Abstract

Object detection is used to automatically identify and locate specific objects within images or videos for applications like autonomous driving, security surveillance, and medical imaging. Protecting object detection models against adversarial attacks, particularly malicious patches, is crucial to ensure reliable and safe performance in safety-critical applications, where misdetections can lead to severe consequences. Existing defenses against patch attacks are primarily designed for stationary scenes and struggle against adversarial image patches that vary in scale, position, and orientation in dynamic environments.In this paper, we introduce SAR, a patch-agnostic defense scheme based on image preprocessing that does not require additional model training. By integration of the patch-agnostic detection frontend with an additional broken pixel restoration backend, Segment and Recover (SAR) is developed for the large-mask-covered object-hiding attack. Our approach breaks the limitation of the patch scale, shape, and location, accurately localizes the adversarial patch on the frontend, and restores the broken pixel on the backend. Our evaluations of the clean performance demonstrate that SAR is compatible with a variety of pretrained object detectors. Moreover, SAR exhibits notable resilience improvements over state-of-the-art methods evaluated in this paper. Our comprehensive evaluation studies involve diverse patch types, such as localized-noise, printable, visible, and adaptive adversarial patches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d453a431b076d99fa599c8https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11090316
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fast R-CNN2015 · 28,424 citations
  2. 2On Visible Adversarial Perturbations & Digital Watermarking2018 · 131 citations
  3. 3Jedi: Entropy-Based Localization and Removal of Adversarial Patches2023 · 45 citations
  4. 4(De)Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable Defense against Patch Attacks2020 · 49 citations
  5. 5Jujutsu: A Two-stage Defense against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Deep Neural Networks2023 · 22 citations