PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 20250 citations

Glyceryl trinitrate for treating hyperacute stroke: the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke-2 (ENOS-2) feasibility randomised controlled trial

View Full Paper
LWLisa J WoodhouseIMIris MhlangaABAmanda Buck

Key Points

  • The trial recruited 39 participants, suggesting significant challenges in meeting recruitment goals.
  • No significant differences in blood pressure changes between the glyceryl trinitrate and sham groups were observed.
  • Headache incidence was higher in the glyceryl trinitrate group, but serious adverse events remained comparable.
  • Although GTN seemed safe, further multicentre trials are necessary to explore its efficacy in stroke treatment.

Abstract

Abstract Background High blood pressure is associated with a poor outcome after stroke. Trials of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a nitric oxide donor, have suggested that treatment between 3 and 5 hours might improve functional outcome. Methods We randomly assigned hospitalised patients with an acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke to 2 days of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, 5 mg/day) or sham, started between 3 and 5 hours after onset. The primary feasibility outcome was recruitment rate; proof of concept was assessed by central observers blinded to treatment assignment at 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Data are number (%), median interquartile range or mean (standard deviation). Comparisons by adjusted multiple linear regression. Findings 39 of an intended 120 participants were recruited; common exclusions were presentation >5 hours of onset or out of researcher working hours, no eligible symptoms/signs or an unclear onset time. Mean age 72 (13) years, female 41%, blood pressure 161.8(18.4)/80.8(14.9) mmHg, time from onset at baseline 216 186, 251 minutes. The fall in blood pressure over 24 hours did not differ between GTN versus sham. Headache was more common with GTN but there was no difference in serious adverse events. mRS at 3 months did not differ between the groups. Interpretation Recruitment limitations prevented demonstration of feasibility for patients in the time window of 3-5 hours post ictus. GTN appeared safe and showed some evidence of proof-of-concept. A multicentre trial needs to further test this hypothesis. Registration ISRCTN17654248 Date: 31/3/2021

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Woodhouse et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d454d831b076d99fa5accchttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7494203/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Glyceryl trinitrate versus sham in the treatment of hyperacute stroke: the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke-2 (ENOS-2) feasibility randomised controlled trial2026
  2. 2Rapid Intravenous Glyceryl Trinitrate in Ischemic Damage (RIGID): A potential neuroprotection strategy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1610 THE EFFECT OF TRANSDERMAL GLYCERYL TRINITRATE ON EARLY NEUROLOGICAL DETERIORATION AND 90 DAY FUNCTIONAL AND COGNITIVE OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE LACUNAR SYNDROME STROKE2026
  4. 4Impact of nitroglycerin on 28-day mortality in ischemic stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database2025
  5. 5Statistical analysis plan for the ‘Rapid Intervention with Glyceryl trinitrate in Hypertensive stroke Trial-2 (RIGHT-2)’2018 · 12 citations