PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Journal of dramatic theory and criticism0 citations

Scrutiny and Use: Contending with Consent in University Performance

View Full Paper
LHLindsay Brandon Hunter

Key Points

  • Critical examination of consent illuminates its complexities and limitations in performance settings.
  • Universities bear a responsibility to scrutinize consent beyond institutional norms for professionalized practice.
  • Understanding consent's histories and implications can foster exploration and imaginative responses.
  • This approach challenges the oversimplification of consent frameworks, enriching performance practices.

Abstract

Abstract: This essay argues that universities that stage performance and train students in its practice bear a responsibility to contend with and scrutinize consent rather than merely aim to institute professionalized norms for consent-based practice. Committing to critical examination of consent and its tenets, even when or as consent-based performance work is practiced, could better illuminate the limits of consent frameworks, making consent's troubling histories, its infelicitous promises, its hopeful and its vexing implications available for exploration, confrontation, imagination, and invention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lindsay Brandon Hunter (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4565431b076d99fa5afd3https://doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2025.a969274
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper