PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025European Journal of Soil Science0 citations

Environmental and Geochemical Controls on Acid Sulfate Soil Formation Along the Southern Baltic Sea Coast

View Full Paper
PHPiotr HuliszAMAdam MichalskiMDMichał Dąbrowski

Key Points

  • High variability in acid sulfate soil properties is influenced by topographic position and hydrological regime.
  • Geochemical indicators effectively assess soil variability, including potential acidification risks.
  • Hypersulfidic materials indicate sulfide accumulation in various geomorphological settings.
  • Local environmental controls play a crucial role in acid sulfate soil development, emphasizing the need for methodical assessment.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the environmental and geochemical controls on forming and transforming acid sulfate (AS) soils along the southern Baltic Sea coast. Field surveys and laboratory analyses were conducted on a series of coastal soil transects located in hydrologically dynamic environments, including abrasive terraces/beaches, micro‐cliffs/beach ridges, and organic‐rich depressions. The results revealed a high site‐specific variability in AS soil properties driven by topographic position, hydrological regime, and sedimentary history. Hypersulfidic materials, indicative of sulfide accumulation under reducing conditions, were found across all geomorphological settings. Geochemical indicators such as field pH, total organic carbon to total sulfur ratio, chloride, and calcium carbonate content proved effective in assessing the soil variability, including acidification potential. Magnetic susceptibility measurements indicated a predominantly natural origin of potentially toxic elements and the absence of technogenic contamination. However, under changing redox conditions, particularly in carbonate‐poor soils, the mobilisation of toxic elements such as chromium, nickel, lead, and zinc cannot be excluded, despite their generally low concentrations. Organic matter, derived from both autochthonous and allochthonous sources, played a key role in sulfidisation processes, although the influence of its humification degree on acidification risk remains unclear. Overall, the study highlights the importance of localised environmental controls in AS soil development and provides a methodological framework for identifying similar systems in other coastal plains of the Baltic Sea.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hulisz et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4566c31b076d99fa5bafehttps://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geochemical and mineralogical characterization of acid sulfate soils in Luleå, northern Sweden2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Properties and Distribution of Acid Sulfate Soils in Freshwater Wetlands During Drying‐Wetting Cycles on Norfolk Island2025
  3. 3Temporal and spatial investigations of the isotope biogeochemistry of a coastal peatland area under sporadic flooding 2024
  4. 4Carbonate Chemistry in Groundwater and Rivers Draining to the Baltic Sea: Implications for Coastal Ocean Acidification2026
  5. 5Discharge of potentially toxic elements from acid sulfate soils in western Finland: Conflict between water protection and land use?2024 · 6 citations