PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition1 citations

Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI

View Full Paper
YLYali LiHYHong Yuan

Key Points

  • 5.0 T MRI enhances the accuracy of quantifying both proton density fat fraction and iron content.
  • Quantitative comparisons between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI showed high spatial resolution benefits.
  • 127 participants underwent MRI scans to evaluate measurement consistency across different field strengths.
  • The findings suggest that 5.0 T MRI can serve as a reliable noninvasive biomarker in clinical settings.

Abstract

Motivation: With the increasing availability of 5.0 T scanners, the feasibility of fat content and iron burden needs to be reevaluated at 5.0 T. Goal(s): To determine the accuracy and consistency of the PDFF and R2* in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and paraspinal muscle across different magnetic strengths and MR scanners. Approach: 127 participants underwent 3.0 T MRI 1 (uMR 780), 3.0 T MRI 2 (uMR 880), and 5.0 T MRI (uMR Jupiter). Results: The high spatial resolution of 5.0 T MRI improves the quantification accuracy of PDFF and R2* in abdominal multi-organs. Impact: Due to high interfield agreement of the PDFF and R2* with 3.0 T, 5.0 T could be used as a reliable noninvasive biomarker for quantifying fat and iron contents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4597031b076d99fa5c78fhttps://doi.org/10.58530/2025/4956
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper