PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition0 citations

xvQSM: An Open-Source Artifact Mitigation Method for ex vivo Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

View Full Paper
ARAlexandra H. RobertsADAlexey DimovMŞMert Şişman

Key Points

  • Artifact reduction significantly improves confidence in validation of ex vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping.
  • High structural similarity is observed, supporting the effectiveness of the proposed artifact mitigation method.
  • The numerical phantom and ex vivo brain tissue analysis validate the new approach to enhance myelin mapping.
  • This open-source pipeline offers potential advancements in oxygen extraction fraction and structural imaging.

Abstract

Motivation: Ex vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping is motivated by artifacts in phantom or post-mortem reconstructions serving as gold standards for new methods. The nonlocal dipole deconvolution propagates artifacts and introduces error into these reconstructions, impeding the validation process. Goal(s): The presented pipeline is an open-source tool to mitigate artifacts in susceptibility reconstruction and subsequent processing such as source separation and myelin mapping. Approach: A numerical phantom and ex vivo brain tissues are reconstructed with the proposed method. Results: Artifact reduction is observed and high structural similarity is observed. Impact: The presented method mitigates ex vivo artifacts to increase confidence in validation. High structural similarity is observed from whole region of interest filtering and homogeneity regularization. This open-source pipeline improves source separation and potentially myelin mapping, and oxygen extraction fraction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roberts et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4597b31b076d99fa5cb27https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/3430
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper