PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition0 citations

BIASS: Benchmarking the Impact of Anatomical Segmentation in Spectroscopy

View Full Paper
JAJessica ArchibaldKIKay C. IgweAKAntonia Kaiser

Key Points

  • Variability in tissue fraction estimates across segmentation methods significantly impacts brain MRS outcomes.
  • CSF showed the highest inconsistencies in estimates compared to GM and WM across multiple segmentation tools.
  • Ground truth comparisons reveal notable differences in tissue volumes that affect water-scaled concentration estimates.
  • Segmentation tools like FSL, ANTs, and SPM differ considerably, indicating the importance of choice in clinical applications.

Abstract

Motivation: Water-scaled metabolite estimates in brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) usually require corrections accounting for differences in water content and water and metabolite relaxation behavior gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Goal(s): This study aims to determine how strongly commonly used segmentation tools differ in determining partial volumes from a typical MRS single-voxel volume. Approach: By analyzing GM, WM, and CSF fractions obtained from segmentation tools (e.g., FSL, ANTs, and SPM) and comparing them to manual segmentation as "ground truth". Results: Significant variability in tissue fraction estimates across segmentation methods for different brain regions, with CSF showing the highest inconsistencies. Impact: This study demonstrates that segmentation tools obtain different tissue volume fraction estimates in a typical MRS voxel. These findings help researchers and clinicians understand the variability that the choice of segmentation algorithm contributes to the uncertainty of water-scaled concentration estimates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Archibald et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45b1b31b076d99fa5d3f9https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/4826
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper