PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Energy Modelling Research Landscape in Kenya: A Systematic Review.

View Full Paper
NFNeve FieldsBKBoniface KinyanjuiEBEdward Brown

Key Points

  • The review identifies six key themes in Kenyan energy modelling, including electrification and clean cooking, for future research opportunities.
  • A majority of current energy modelling research in Kenya is led by European institutions, with limited local collaboration observed.
  • The systematic review highlights three methodological themes: mixed methods, soft-linking, and policy implications found in the literature.
  • Significant limitations in the existing literature relate to data quality, model scope, and an overemphasis on techno-economic assessments.

Abstract

Energy system modelling to explore development pathways has advanced significantly in recent decades as a critical tool and widely integrated methodology for energy planning procedures within Kenya. Modellers, analysts, and academics have applied such tools to support international, national, regional and local organisations and policymakers within Kenya to make evidence-informed energy policy and development decisions. As the body of energy modelling literature examining Kenyan applications expands and evolves, it is helpful to investigate research developments to guide current and future modelling research. This paper employs a systematic literature review, examining 79 studies, tracking the progress, challenges, gaps, and trends related to energy modelling research related to Kenya over the last decade. We show that current energy modelling research with Kenyan applications typically operate outside of Kenya, largely conducted by European research institutions, with most articles consisting of no Kenyan co-authorship. Six key research themes were identified across the examined articles: electrification, clean cooking, emissions, resources, energy transitions, and grids. Additionally, three methodological themes of mixed methods, soft-linking, and policy implications were outlined. Three main limitations were defined across the existing literature including data, model scope, and looking beyond techno-economic assessment. Furthermore, two key future research directions were identified as increasing geographical resolution, and integration of social considerations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fields et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45b1b31b076d99fa5d817https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-7lmg3-v2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines2019 · 10,782 citations
  2. 2How can emerging economies meet development and climate goals in the transport-energy system? Modelling co-developed scenarios in Kenya using a socio-technical approach2024 · 13 citations
  3. 3Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis2005 · 45,016 citations
  4. 4ESCoBox: A Set of Tools for Mini-Grid Sustainability in the Developing World2017 · 16 citations
  5. 5Prospects for grid-connected solar PV in Kenya: A systems approach2015 · 68 citations