PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery5 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes and complications of conversion THA after internal fixation of proximal femur fractures: a systematic review

View Full Paper
AMAlberto Di MartinoScuola Superiore Sant'AnnaCDClaudio D’AgostinoIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRPRiccardo PoluzziOrthopedic Institute

Key Points

  • Conversion total hip arthroplasty after internal fixation is associated with high complication rates, particularly when using intramedullary nails.
  • Post-fixation complications reported include a 6.01% dislocation rate and 11.57% periprosthetic fractures after specific fixation methods.
  • The analysis included twelve studies with 1,260 patients, following PRISMA guidelines for quality assessment in the systematic review.
  • Observations indicate that different fixation devices lead to varied rates of complications, emphasizing the complexity of cTHA in these cases.

Abstract

The goal of this systematic review is to analyse clinical results and complications of conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) after failure of internal fixation (IFix), distinguishing according to the initial fixation method: intramedullary nail, plate/screw systems, and cannulated screws. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database were firstly accessed in April 2025, and lastly checked on July 2025, to identify studies addressing patients who underwent to cTHA after sustaining proximal femoral fractures with subsequent IFix. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the quality of studies was assessed. Data were extracted from the identified articles and summarised. Twelve retrospective studies on 1,260 patients analyzed complications of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) after internal fixation of the femur. After fixation with an intramedullary nail, cTHA showed a 6.01% dislocation rate, 3.14% periprosthetic fractures, 2.59% aseptic loosening, and 3.41% periprosthetic infections, with a 3.82% reoperation rate. Fixation with a plate/screw system resulted in fewer complications but a higher incidence of periprosthetic fractures (11.57%). A notably higher dislocation rate of 10.04% was observed following fixation with cannulated screws. This review confirms that cTHA after IFix of proximal femoral fractures is associated to an elevated rate of perioperative complications, with a higher incidence when cTHA is performed after intramedullary nail fixation; a higher incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures is observed on those patients treated by plate/screws system at first surgery. Unexpectedly, a higher rate of implant dislocations is recorded in those patients undergoing cTHAs after IFix by cannulated screws.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martino et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45b2931b076d99fa5db18https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02977-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Fixation for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures1998 · 382 citations
  2. 2A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: A 2- to 6-year follow-up study2003 · 142 citations
  3. 3Association Between Uncemented vs Cemented Hemiarthroplasty and Revision Surgery Among Patients With Hip Fracture2020 · 116 citations
  4. 4Secondary arthroplasty for complications of femoral neck fracture1989 · 65 citations
  5. 5Conversion of failed internal fixation in proximal femur fractures using calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty2022 · 12 citations