PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Discover Education2 citationsOpen Access

Semiotic analysis of UML class diagrams in pedagogy: a case of first-year BCIS students

View Full Paper
PKPakiso J. KhomokhoanaRFRouxan Colin FouchéTNTlholohelo Nkalai

Key Points

  • Students employ diverse strategies when engaging with UML class diagrams, enhancing understanding and communication.
  • Consistent analytical approaches lead to better comprehension of these communicative artifacts, as revealed by the data.
  • The narrative research approach incorporated semi-structured interviews and think-aloud protocols to gather insights from participants.
  • Findings highlight the need for educational practices that blend technical notation with interpretive strategies in UML pedagogy.

Abstract

Unified Modelling Language (UML) class diagrams are standard tools in software engineering education, typically analysed for syntactical correctness rather than their communicative dimensions. This study applies semiotic theory to investigate how first-year Bachelor of Computer Information Systems students engage with UML class diagrams as communicative artifacts. Using a narrative research approach based on the integrated-methods research framework, data was collected through individual semi-structured interviews incorporating think-aloud protocols with 11 participants. Participants completed tasks of increasing complexity: analysing simple diagrams, describing relationships between classes, and creating their own class diagrams. Data analysis followed a systematic coding framework aligned with the six semiotic principles: identifying diagram elements, deciphering signs and symbols, understanding the contextual significance, interpretation and meaning, contextualisation within broader discourse, and critical reflection. Findings reveal that students employ diverse strategies when approaching UML class diagrams, with consistent analytical approaches yielding better comprehension. Visual elements significantly influence interpretation, while terminological confusion and cognitive load present key challenges. This research contributes to UML pedagogy by highlighting the need for educational approaches that address both technical notation and interpretive strategies, balancing concrete examples with abstract structural thinking.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khomokhoana et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45b3431b076d99fa5dcd6https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00817-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cognitive strategies in interpreting UML class diagrams with emphasis on load, order and symbolic confusion2026
  2. 2Systematic Teaching of UML and Behavioral Diagrams2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Professional Use and Teaching of UML: Perceptions of Brasília-DF Region Software Practitioners and Higher Education Instructors2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4UML crisis! An educational perspective2025
  5. 5Understanding Education and Professional Practice of UML: Insights from Brazil and Portugal2025