PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Frontiers in Oncology5 citationsOpen Access

The paradoxical role of stem cells in osteosarcoma: from pathogenesis to therapeutic breakthroughs

View Full Paper
ZSZhengbing SuXFXiang FangHDHong Duan

Key Points

  • Osteosarcoma exhibits high metastatic potential, leading to poor prognosis despite multimodal therapies.
  • Cancer stem cells drive tumor progression through dysregulated pathways including Wnt/β-catenin and Notch.
  • Mesenchymal stem cells can both influence tumor progression and serve as vehicles for targeted drug delivery.
  • Challenges such as CSC heterogeneity and inefficient cell homing pose significant barriers to effective therapy.

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS), the most prevalent primary malignant bone tumor in adolescents, exhibits a high metastatic potential and resistance to therapy. This characteristic results in a dismal prognosis in advanced cases even following multimodal therapies. This review synthesizes the dual roles of stem cells in OS pathogenesis and therapeutic innovation. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive tumor initiation, progression, and chemoresistance through dysregulated molecular pathways that include Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, and Hedgehog signaling, with key markers such as CD133 and CXCR4 contributing to stemness maintenance and metastasis. Concurrently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) paradoxically influence OS progression. Although their tumor-homing capacity enables targeted drug delivery (e.g., IDD-1040-paclitaxel complexes) and immunomodulation, MSC-derived factors like TGF-β can promote cancer-associated fibroblast differentiation and immune evasion. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), characterized by hypoxia-induced HIF-1α activation, metabolic reprogramming, and M2 macrophage polarization, further facilitates CSC resilience and therapy resistance. Emerging strategies—including CSCs-targeted agents (AZD1080, DNMTi/HDACi), CRISPR/Cas9-engineered CD133-directed CAR-T cells, and MSC-mediated delivery of oncolytic viruses—show preclinical promise in overcoming these barriers. However, critical challenges persist: intratumoral CSC heterogeneity limits targeted therapy efficacy; MSC functional plasticity risks tumor promotion via fusion or batch variations; and inefficient cell homing due to pulmonary entrapment reduces therapeutic delivery. Future directions necessitate biomarker-guided combinatorial approaches, optimized MSC administration routes (e.g., intra-arterial injection), and integrated multi-omics profiling to address translational bottlenecks. Resolving these issues will advance personalized stem cell-focused therapies for OS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Su et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45e6231b076d99fa5ecf5https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1643491
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Current Treatment of Osteosarcoma2001 · 295 citations
  2. 2Long‐term expansion with germline potential of human primordial germ cell‐like cells in vitro2020 · 72 citations
  3. 3Genetically-modified Stem Cell in Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Therapy; A New Era2021 · 36 citations
  4. 4Human mesenchymal stromal cells from adult and neonatal sources: comparative analysis of their morphology, immunophenotype, differentiation patterns and neural protein expression2009 · 116 citations
  5. 5Human pluripotent stem cell-derived ectomesenchymal stromal cells promote more robust functional recovery than umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells after hypoxic-ischaemic brain damage2021 · 54 citations