PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Antipsychotics for Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
SASai Sahithi Reddy AtlaPGP. GunasekaranSKShradha Pandurang Kakde

Key Points

  • No antipsychotic demonstrated clear superiority over placebo in treating psychosis associated with Parkinson’s disease.
  • Efficacy metrics showed no significant improvements in psychosis severity (BPRS, CGI-S) across all treatment arms.
  • The analysis included 22 randomized controlled trials involving 2,047 participants with varying age and gender distributions.
  • Results highlight a need for stronger evidence on the safety and efficacy of atypical antipsychotics for Parkinson’s disease psychosis.

Abstract

Abstract Background Psychosis affects over half of people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) over the disease course and severely worsens quality of life. Clinicians often face a trade-off between reducing dopaminergic therapies to control hallucinations/delusions and maintaining motor function. Multiple atypical antipsychotics are used, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. Methods We conducted a prespecified systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) following PRISMA 2020 and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251143957). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched to August 2025 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials evaluating atypical antipsychotics for PD psychosis were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB 2); certainty was appraised with GRADE. Continuous outcomes (BPRS, CGI-S, UPDRS-II) were synthesized as mean differences; binary outcomes (adverse events, discontinuation, mortality, cardiovascular events) as risk ratios in a random-effects NMA, with placebo as the common comparator. Results A total of 22 trials with 2,047 participants (mean age 70.6 ± 12 years; 1,038 males and 997 females) were included, with a mean follow-up of 2.73 ± 1.0 months. Across treatment arms, 1,091 patients received active interventions and 1,036 placebo. The active groups included clozapine (n=139), olanzapine (n=111), pimavanserin (n=746), quetiapine (n=126), risperidone (n=5), and ziprasidone (n=8). None of the drugs demonstrated consistent or statistically significant superiority over placebo in reducing psychosis severity as measured by BPRS or CGI-S, although clozapine and quetiapine showed trends toward improvement and risperidone suggested possible benefit with very wide intervals due to small samples. Motor and daily living outcomes assessed with UPDRS-II revealed no significant changes across treatments, with pooled effects for clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, pimavanserin, risperidone, and ziprasidone all overlapping the null. Safety analyses indicated no meaningful increase in risk of PD worsening, insomnia, cardiovascular events, or mortality compared with placebo, with overall pooled risk ratios approximating unity and showing no heterogeneity. SUCRA rankings suggested risperidone and clozapine as potentially more efficacious on BPRS, olanzapine as higher on CGI-S, and ziprasidone on UPDRS-II, though none achieved robust statistical significance. Conclusions No antipsychotic showed clear superiority over placebo; clozapine and pimavanserin remain the most relevant options, but stronger evidence is needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Atla et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45e6a31b076d99fa5f16dhttps://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.25335549
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper