PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Frontiers in Endocrinology4 citationsOpen Access

Real-world efficacy of MiniMed™780G recommended settings (glycemic target 100 mg/dL, active insulin time 2 hours) in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes

View Full Paper
MBMarta BassiGSGiordano SpaccoFPFederico Pezzotta

Key Points

  • Switching to the MiniMed™780G settings improved glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia risks.
  • The proportion of patients meeting ADA-recommended glycemic targets increased from 29.5% at baseline to 40% at T3.
  • Time in Range improved significantly from 71.9% at T1 to 75.0% at T3 after implementing the new settings.
  • The automatic correction boluses contributed more to the total insulin dose, while daily insulin requirements remained stable.

Abstract

Background and aims Despite growing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the MiniMed™ 780G recommended settings (Glucose Target 100 mg/dL and Active Insulin Time 2 hours), their adoption in routine practice remains limited, mainly due to concerns about hypoglycemia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of switching to these settings in pediatric and young patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis in children and young adults using MiniMed™780G system at our center. Patients who switched from their initial settings to a glucose target of 100 mg/dL and an active insulin time of 2 hours for clinical indications were included. Data were retrospectively collected 3 months after switch. Glycemic metrics were compared over the 14 days before the switch (T0) and at 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T3). Results Ninety-one patients with a mean age of 17.89y were included, 81.3% of whom already had a glucose target of 100 mg/dL at baseline. Therefore, in most cases the primary change was reducing AIT from 3 to 2 hours. After switching to the recommended settings, Time in Range (TIR) significantly increased (p0.001) at T1 (71.9% vs 74.8%) and T3 (71.9% vs 75.0%). Time in target range (TITR) similarly improved from 47.2% at T0 to 51.4% at T1 and 50.9% at T3 (p0.001) without any significant increase in time below range (TBR). The proportion of patients meeting all ADA-recommended glycemic targets rose from 29.5% at baseline to 40% at T3. Following the switch, the contribution of automatic correction boluses to the total insulin dose increased, while overall daily insulin requirements remained stable. Conclusions Switching to the recommended MiniMed™780G settings, driven primarily by AIT reduction in most patients, was safe and effective, improving glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia. These findings support broader use of these settings in pediatric and young adult patient with type 1 diabetes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bassi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4605131b076d99fa5fbd2https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1670266
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Celebrating the Data from 100,000 Real-World Users of the MiniMed™ 780G System in Europe, Middle East, and Africa Collected Over 3 Years: From Data to Clinical Evidence2024 · 77 citations
  2. 2A Peek Under the Hood: Explaining the MiniMed™ 780G Algorithm with Meal Detection Technology2024 · 34 citations
  3. 3Long‐term use of Minimed™ 780G in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes under real‐world conditions: The benefits of optimal settings2025 · 9 citations
  4. 4Improved Glycemic Outcomes With Medtronic MiniMed Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Delivery: Results From a Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing Automated Insulin Delivery With Predictive Low Glucose Suspend in People With Type 1 Diabetes2021 · 278 citations
  5. 5Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in maintaining glycaemic control among people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis2022 · 185 citations