PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics6 citationsOpen Access

Myopia control and modulation transfer functions for multisegment spectacle lenses

View Full Paper
WCW. N. CharmanDADavid A. Atchison

Key Points

  • Lenses with a lenslet array lower modulation transfer function compared to single-vision lenses.
  • Visual resolution is notably better with axial viewing through the clear center of multisegment lenses.
  • Poor imagery occurs in peripheral observations at 32.5-degree field angles with the lenslet array.
  • Low-pass spatial frequency filtering limits visual resolution through the outer lens regions.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Multisegment (MS) spectacle lenses, providing a distance correction with a clear central area and by having an array of small, positively powered lenslets in the periphery of the front surface, have proved effective in slowing childhood myopia progression. Debate continues as to whether their mechanism of action is due to through‐focus effects or to the image contrast changes due to the inclusion of the lenslets. This study explores the second possibility by modelling the performance of a combined MS lens‐eye optical system in terms of its modulation transfer function (MTF) under various conditions. Methods The optical design program Ansys Zemax OpticsStudio was used to determine distance MTFs for the combination of either a single‐vision or a Hoya MiyoSmart MS lens with a 4 D myopic eye model. Conditions included axial and peripheral objects with co‐axial lens and eye, and rotating the eye away from the lens axis to observe objects through the lenslet‐covered region of the lens. Visual resolution under each condition was estimated. Results Observing objects through the lenslet array lowered modulation transfer in comparison with that given by the single‐vision lens, especially as spatial frequency increased. In peripheral observation at a field angle of approximately 32.5 degrees, imagery was poor. Foveal image quality was better with axial viewing through the clear MS lens centre than when the eye was rotated by approximately 30 degrees. Conclusions Optimal visual resolution during MS lens wear is achieved when fixating through the clear, central area of the lens. Under these circumstances, objects at 20–50 degrees from fixation are seen through the lenslet‐covered region of the carrier which produces a low‐pass spatial frequency filtering effect. Here, visual resolution is limited to a few cycles per degree so that any growth control mechanism must rely on low spatial frequency information.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Charman et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d461cb31b076d99fa61377https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.70016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multiple segment spectacle lenses for myopia control. Part 1: Optics2023 · 27 citations
  2. 2Depth of Focus in Peripheral Vision2009 · 27 citations
  3. 3The Effect of Two-Zone Concentric Bifocal Spectacle Lenses on Refractive Error Development and Eye Growth in Young Chicks2010 · 176 citations
  4. 4Optical and neural resolution in peripheral vision.1975 · 93 citations
  5. 5Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population.1999 · 274 citations