PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Centralized Surgical Care Improves Survival in Non-Functional Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

View Full Paper
AAAhmed AlnajarACAmber L. CollierMAMehmet Akcin

Key Points

  • Treatment at academic hospitals was linked to a 50% higher 15-year survival rate than non-academic hospitals.
  • Patients traveling more than 250 miles saw a 72% survival rate over 15 years compared to 43% for those traveling shorter distances.
  • Primary tumor resection led to a significant 64% reduction in mortality risk, emphasizing its importance in treatment.
  • Non-academic and low-volume hospitals correlated with increased mortality risk, highlighting disparities in care access.

Abstract

Background: Non-functional well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WD-PanNETs) are complex, heterogeneous malignancies with variable prognosis. Despite guideline recommendations, disparities in access to specialized care may impact survival. This study examines whether treatment facility type, geographic travel distance, and treatment modalities are associated with survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with WD-PanNETs. Results: Among 20,174 patients with WD-PanNETs, the median age was 62 years (IQR: 52–70), and 54% were men. The majority were treated at non-academic hospitals (76%), with 2.9% traveling >250 miles for care. Patients treated at non-academic hospitals (24%) had 50% lower 15-year survival rates compared to those treated at academic hospitals (58%) and integrated hospitals (56%) (p 250 miles had a 72% 15-year survival rate, compared to 43% for those traveling <12.5 miles (p < 0.001). In the context of facility-type and geographic distance, treatment at non-academic hospitals <250 miles was associated with a 21% higher mortality risk (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12–1.31, p < 0.001), and treatment at low-volume hospitals increased mortality risk by 25% (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14–1.37, p < 0.001). In contrast, primary tumor resection was associated with a 64% reduction in mortality risk (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.33–0.38, p < 0.001), which remained significant at all disease stages. Conclusion: Treatment at academic or high-volume centers and longer travel distances were associated with improved OS in patients with WD-PanNETs. Primary tumor resection remains critical, while systemic therapies were primarily used in later-stage disease. These findings support policies that improve access to centralized, multidisciplinary care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alnajar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d462ca31b076d99fa6234fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper