PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Accounting auditing & accountability journal/Accounting, auditing & accountability journal0 citations

The development of China’s audit oversight system: an institutional logics perspective

View Full Paper
YYYunxiao YangSDSteven DellaportasLXLina Xu

Key Points

  • Audit oversight in China transformed from 1978 to 2007, reflecting changes in societal logics.
  • The study highlights a non-linear relationship between resource environments and audit oversight practices.
  • Analysis employs institutional logics theory and longitudinal documentary data for comprehensive insights.
  • Understanding of field logics in accounting is enhanced, showing distinct paths influenced by key state actors.

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the growth and development of China's audit oversight system between 1978 and 2007. Particular emphasis is placed on the transformation of audit oversight, with reference to understanding the impact of societal logics on the development of audit oversight in China. Design/methodology/approach The analysis draws on the theory of institutional logics and employs a combination of temporal bracketing and inductive and deductive coding to conduct a longitudinal examination of documentary data. Findings In China, the audit oversight logics change in accordance with developments in the societal logics. However, rather than a simple linear relationship, changes in audit oversight logics occur from developments in the resource environment and symbolic representations to promote and transform material practices within the audit oversight logic. Originality/value Firstly, this study focuses on the audit oversight system in China, which has been underexplored in accounting research, and employs the concept of institutional logics to offer a novel perspective on the transformation of audit oversight, highlighting the importance of the congruence between societal and audit oversight logics. Secondly, this study adds a longitudinal element to the research design, showcasing the distinct path in the development of field logics stemming from key state actors, thus enhancing our understanding of the relationship between societal logics and field logics in accounting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d463e931b076d99fa6326dhttps://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-11-2024-7527
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Role of Environmental Accounting and Public Auditing in Ensuring Sustainable Development: The Experience of China2025
  2. 2Legacies of Logics: Sources of Community Variation in CSR Implementation in China2013
  3. 3Impact of an official accountability audit on industrial structure adjustment: a case study of environmental regulation in China2024
  4. 4The past and future of the China–US audit oversight dispute: a geopolitical perspective2025
  5. 5The impact of institutional environment on auditor reporting: evidence from China's anti-corruption campaign2024