PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Deleted Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Changes in Permanent Contraception Rates in Pennsylvania Associated With the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision

View Full Paper
AAAlice AbernathyCSCourtney A. SchreiberSKSeiyoun Kim

Key Points

  • Permanent contraception rates increased significantly among adults post-Dobbs decision, with the most notable rise in females living in marginalized areas.
  • Analysis revealed an overall 453,244 permanent contraception procedures, predominantly among females, after the Dobbs ruling.
  • Interrupted time series analysis utilized a comprehensive claims database of ambulatory surgical facilities from 2019-2023.
  • These findings suggest shifts in reproductive health decisions, despite legal protections for abortion in Pennsylvania.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in permanent contraception rates among reproductive-aged adults after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision and effect heterogeneity based on sex, distance from abortion care, and measures of marginalization. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using an all payer claims database of ambulatory surgical facilities in Pennsylvania from January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2023. RESULTS: The sample included 453,244 permanent contraception procedures in females (83.2%) and males (16.8%) aged 15–44 years in Pennsylvania. There was a statistically significant temporary increase in permanent contraception procedure rates among females and males after Dobbs . The magnitude of the effect was greatest in females, among whom those residing in areas with higher educational attainment, lower poverty rates, and further from abortion care had the greatest increase in permanent contraception rates. CONCLUSION: Despite continued legal protections for abortion in Pennsylvania, we found an increase in permanent contraception rates among Pennsylvanians after the Dobbs decision.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abernathy et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464e031b076d99fa63e6dhttps://doi.org/10.1097/og9.0000000000000114
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper