PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Another one.0 citations

Editors’ Introduction

View Full Paper
MUM. Ukhin

Key Points

  • The shift to ontological anarchy challenges traditional metaphysical foundations, promoting pluralism in thought.
  • Amazonian tribes illustrate diverse modes of existence, showing how beings can transform across different categories.
  • The acknowledgment of irreducible ontologies opens pathways for resolving contemporary metaphysical dilemmas.
  • Pluralization of existence requires embracing the stranger-native perspective within discourse, enriching collective understanding.

Abstract

This special volume explores the transition from the multiplier turn towards ontological anarchy. This transition constitutes neither a sidestepping nor a refocusing of thought from one subject to another, but rather a de-centered movement of «reflection into itself». Western European metaphysics, transformed notably by Heidegger and subsequently through post-structuralism and post-phenomenology towards Viveiros de Castro, Goddard, and Descola, reveals modes of being-plural. The irreducibility of ontologies actualized by beings in a world where actual place is perpetually insufficient addresses the problem of coexistence without a single — dogmatic — foundation. Prevailing tendencies towards the pluralization of existence necessitate the inclusion of the stranger-native within self-referential discourse. Amazonian tribes demonstrate a multiplicity of ways of drawing distinctions, wherein the natural is no longer homogeneous — to be incorporated into a collective means sharing a commonality of modes and practices of existence; «an animal of one species may transform into an animal of another species or into a human, and a human may transform into an animal». The diversity of life-actualized ontological forms opens the possibility not only to learn more coherent models for resolving the impasses of contemporary Western European metaphysics, but also to begin recalibrating the constants of thought and action — constants that establish constraints while simultaneously opening new possibilities for the transcendental.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

M. Ukhin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464ea31b076d99fa63f77https://doi.org/10.62988/2949-5202-2024-3-2-10-12
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper