PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025AMWA Journal0 citations

Artificial Intelligence Bias in Health Communication: Risks and Strategies for Medical Writers

View Full Paper
RMRed Thaddeus MiguelMJManal El JoumaaRARami Ali

Key Points

  • AI can enhance workflow efficiency, but it also introduces risks related to bias and misinformation.
  • Three core types of bias—data-driven, algorithmic, and human—can affect the integrity of health communication.
  • Medical writers are essential for evaluating the accuracy and fairness of AI outputs in health communication.
  • The paper suggests strategies for medical writers to use AI tools responsibly, ensuring ethical health communication.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing the field of health communication. Medical writers, who are central to making complex medical information understandable and usable, now face both new opportunities and new risks. AI can speed up content creation, improve workflow efficiency, and scale production. At the same time, it introduces concerns related to bias, accuracy, and accountability. This paper focuses on 3 core types of bias that affect AI-generated content: data-driven bias, algorithmic bias, and human bias. These biases often arise from unrepresentative training data, flawed system design, or lack of contextual understanding. Left unchecked, they can lead to misinformation and worsen health disparities. Medical writers play a critical role in mitigating these risks by evaluating AI outputs for accuracy, completeness, and fairness. When guided by clear standards, collaborative practices, and sound editorial judgments, medical writers can help ensure that AI supports ethical, equitable, and effective health communication. This paper offers practical strategies to help medical writers integrate AI tools responsibly without compromising the integrity, ethics, or patient equity of health communication.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miguel et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464f831b076d99fa64774https://doi.org/10.55752/amwa.2025.479
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rise of the machines: trends and challenges of implementing AI in biomedical scientific writing2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Medical journalism: a primer for healthcare professionals and journalists in the artificial intelligence era2026
  3. 3Biomedical research publication in the age of artificial intelligence: Current prospects for balancing integrity and innovation2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Medical publication and role of Artificial Intelligence2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5The two Sides of the Artificial Intelligence Coin in Medical Sciences: a Look at the Human and Ethical Dimensions2025