PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025European Journal of Education16 citations

ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review of Current Landscape, Limitations and Future Directions Through General System Theory Lens

View Full Paper
HLHsin‐Yu LeeYHYueh‐Min HuangTWTing‐Ting Wu

Key Points

  • Educational benefits of ChatGPT are promising yet uneven, with notable impacts on knowledge construction and skills development.
  • Among 92 studies analyzed, 69.7% focus on higher education, while only 3.4% pertain to primary settings.
  • Research design limitations include small or medium-scale studies, affecting insights into primary and secondary education.
  • Future research should enhance sample sizes and balance coverage across educational levels for optimal ChatGPT application.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rapid proliferation of ChatGPT has fuelled expectations of transformative change in education; yet most systematic reviews remain confined to single disciplines or educational levels. Adopting general system theory (GST) and the knowledge‐skills‐attitudes (KSA) framework, this review offers a more comprehensive perspective on ChatGPT's educational impact. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched major academic databases for studies published between November 2022 and March 2024, screened them against predefined criteria, and ultimately analysed 92 eligible papers through qualitative content analysis. Findings were mapped onto the five GST elements—subject, information, medium, environment and technology. Research to date is markedly concentrated in higher education (69.7%), with far less work in primary (3.4%) and secondary (13.5%) settings. Nearly half of the studies target STEM subjects (45.6%). The most frequently reported applications are timely feedback (55 occurrences), content generation (20) and personalised learning (15). Positive effects are most evident for knowledge construction (63 occurrences) and skills development (59), whereas attitudinal outcomes receive comparatively little attention (20). Overall, the evidence points to promising—but uneven—educational benefits. Prevailing limitations include small‐ or medium‐scale research designs and the under‐representation of primary and secondary contexts. Future work should adopt larger samples, give greater weight to attitudinal dimensions, and strive for a more balanced coverage across all educational levels to realise ChatGPT's full potential in teaching and learning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464f831b076d99fa64950https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper