PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Sustainability2 citationsOpen Access

Study on the Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the Synergistic Effect of Pollution and Carbon Reduction: A Case Study of the Chengdu–Chongqing Region, China

View Full Paper
TZTing ZhangZZZeyu ZhangXZXiling Zhang

Key Points

  • During the study period, air pollutant equivalents declined while carbon emissions continued to rise, indicating mixed results.
  • The coupling coordination degree remained low, showing fluctuations and a slight improvement in the synergistic effects between pollution control and carbon reduction.
  • Analysis utilized the coupling coordination degree model, spatial autocorrelation, and Tobit regression for comprehensive insights.
  • Economic development and environmental regulation positively influenced synergy, while urbanization and energy consumption had negative impacts.

Abstract

In the context of China’s “double carbon” goals, examining the spatial–temporal characteristics and influencing factors of the synergistic effect of pollution control and carbon reduction (SEPCR) in the Chengdu–Chongqing region (CCR) is crucial for advancing both air pollution (AP) control and carbon emissions (CE) mitigation. This study uses data on AP and CE from 2007 to 2022 and employs the coupling coordination degree (CCD) model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and kernel density estimation to investigate the spatial–temporal distribution and dynamic evolution of the CCD between AP and CE in the CCR. Additionally, the Tobit regression model is applied to identify the key factors influencing this synergy. The results indicate that (1) during the study period, the air pollutant equivalents (APE) in the CCR showed a declining trend, while CE continued to increase; (2) the overall level of coupling coordination remained low, exhibiting an evolutionary pattern of initial increase, subsequent decrease, and then recovery, with synergistic effects showing slight improvement but significant fluctuations; (3) the SEPCR in the CCR was generally dispersed, exhibiting no significant spatial autocorrelation. A “core–periphery” structure emerged, with Chongqing and Chengdu as the core and peripheral cities forming low-value zones. Low–low clusters indicative of a “synergy poverty trap” also appeared; (4) economic development (PGDP), openness level (OP), and environmental regulation intensity (ER) are significant positive drivers, while urbanization rate (UR), industrial structure upgrading (IS), and energy consumption intensity (EI) exert significant negative impacts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464ff31b076d99fa64be3https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188365
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper