PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Buildings12 citationsOpen Access

Large Language Models for Construction Risk Classification: A Comparative Study

View Full Paper
AEAbdolmajid ErfaniHKHussein Khanjar

Key Points

  • LLMs, especially GPT-4 with few-shot prompts, achieve competitive performance in classifying construction risks.
  • The best classical model, BERT + SVM, shows an F1 score of 0.86 compared to LLMs' 0.81, indicating high effectiveness.
  • Twelve model configurations were evaluated, ranging from classical NLP techniques to advanced transformer-based models.
  • This research supports early-stage project planning and risk assessment in scenarios with limited labeled data and expert resources.

Abstract

Risk identification is a critical concern in the construction industry. In recent years, there has been a growing trend of applying artificial intelligence (AI) tools to detect risks from unstructured data sources such as news articles, social media, contracts, and financial reports. The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) in text analysis, summarization, and generation offers promising opportunities to improve construction risk identification. This study conducts a comprehensive benchmarking of natural language processing (NLP) and LLM techniques for automating the classification of risk items into a generic risk category. Twelve model configurations are evaluated, ranging from classical NLP pipelines using TF-IDF and Word2Vec to advanced transformer-based models such as BERT and GPT-4 with zero-shot, instruction, and few-shot prompting strategies. The results reveal that LLMs, particularly GPT-4 with few-shot prompts, achieve a competitive performance (F1 = 0.81) approaching that of the best classical model (BERT + SVM; F1 = 0.86), all without the need for training data. Moreover, LLMs exhibit a more balanced performance across imbalanced risk categories, showcasing their adaptability in data-sparse settings. These findings contribute theoretically by positioning LLMs as scalable plug-and-play alternatives to NLP pipelines, offering practical value by highlighting how LLMs can support early-stage project planning and risk assessment in contexts where labeled data and expert resources are limited.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Erfani et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d466a831b076d99fa64f53https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183379
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Using ChatGPT in construction projects: unveiling its cybersecurity risks through a bibliometric analysis2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Application of Fuzzy Risk Allocation Decision Model for Improving the Nigerian Public–Private Partnership Mass Housing Project Procurement2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Evaluating various machine learning algorithms for automated inspection of culverts2023 · 47 citations
  4. 4A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) Fifth Edition2013 · 688 citations
  5. 5Intelligent design and optimization system for shear wall structures based on large language models and generative artificial intelligence2024 · 59 citations