PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 20252 citations

RobustX: Robust Counterfactual Explanations Made Easy

View Full Paper
JJJunqi JiangLMLuca MarzariAPAaryan Purohit

Key Points

  • RobustX aims to facilitate better explainability in machine learning models by improving the robustness of counterfactual explanations.
  • The tool provides easy access to state-of-the-art counterfactual explanation techniques, enhancing their evaluation and utility.
  • RobustX includes standardised tools for comparing methods of robust counterfactual explanation generation, addressing existing challenges.
  • The open-source nature of RobustX allows for rapid prototyping of novel methods, fostering innovation in explainability techniques.

Abstract

The increasing use of Machine Learning (ML) models to aid decision-making in high-stakes industries demands explainability to facilitate trust. Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) are ideally suited for this, as they can offer insights into the predictions of an ML model by illustrating how changes in its input data may lead to different outcomes. However, for CEs to realise their explanatory potential, significant challenges remain in ensuring their robustness under slight changes in the scenario being explained. Despite the widespread recognition of CEs' robustness as a fundamental requirement, a lack of standardised tools and benchmarks hinders a comprehensive and effective comparison of robust CE generation methods. In this paper, we introduce RobustX, an open-source Python library implementing a collection of CE generation and evaluation methods, with a focus on the robustness property. RobustX provides interfaces to several existing methods from the literature, enabling streamlined access to state-of-the-art techniques. The library is also easily extensible, allowing fast prototyping of novel robust CE generation and evaluation methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d469d631b076d99fa66e1ahttps://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/1264
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper