PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 20250 citations

Precarity and Solidarity: Preliminary Results on a Study of Queer and Disabled Fiction Writers’ Experiences with Generative AI

View Full Paper
CLCarolyn LambDBDaniel G. BrownMGMaura R. Grossman

Key Points

  • Queer and disabled writers express greater pessimism about generative AI’s impact on their field than others, highlighting unique challenges they face.
  • The study shows that the majority attitude towards generative AI among all writers is pessimistic, emanating from fears about job security.
  • Strategies employed by marginalized writers include advocacy and community-building to protect their work from the threats posed by generative AI.
  • The research examines how generative AI exacerbates existing precarity, raising important questions about equity and creativity in writing industries.

Abstract

We present a mixed-methods study of professional fiction writers' experiences with generative AI (genAI), primarily focused on queer and disabled writers. Queer and disabled writers are markedly more pessimistic than others about the impact of genAI on their industry, although pessimism is the majority attitude for all groups. We explore how genAI exacerbates existing causes of precarity for writers, reasons why writers are opposed to its use, and strategies used by marginalized fiction writers to safeguard their industry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lamb et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d469d631b076d99fa671eahttps://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/1124
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper