PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2025Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal Series 1 Issues in Education Science and Culture0 citationsOpen Access

The Poetics of Ekphrasis in the ‘Pushkinian Text’ by B. K. Zaytsev

View Full Paper
ECEkaterina A. ChertenkoAMAleksandr A. Medvedev

Key Points

  • Zaytsev's ecphrastic strategy vitalizes Pushkin’s image, linking historical and artistic realms.
  • The analysis highlights four ecphrasis types: architectural, sculptural, pictorial, and musical, enhancing literary understanding.
  • Zaytsev ontologizes Pushkin’s work, merging cultural traditions and modern readings of his poetic significance.
  • The study reveals how Zaytsev connects Pushkin to contemporary philosophical thoughts, facilitating a deeper cultural dialogue.

Abstract

The article deals with the poetics of ekphrasis in B. K. Zaytsev’s ‘Pushkinian text’ (eight essays on Pushkin, 1925–1962). The ecphrastic codes and their functions in Zaytsev’s essay on Pushkin are analyzed: architectural (architecture of the Italian Renaissance, French neoclassicism, French Gothic); sculptural (monument by A. M. Opekushin); pictorial ecphrasis (iconography by A. Rublev, “Vatican Stanzas” by Raphael); musical ecphrasis (Bach, Mozart). The monument by the sculptor Opekushin becomes for Zaytsev a landmark image of the Celebrations of 1880 and a living link with them in the twentieth century. This monument is an eternal image above time, above the tragic whirlpools of Russian history, its witness and ontological accomplice of living life. Zaytsev ontologizes sculptural ecphrasis, blurring the boundaries between life and art and ontologically “resurrecting” Pushkin. Zaytsev’s understanding of Pushkin as a whole is characterized by Raphael’s “reading” of the poet as a Renaissance and harmonious creator who synthesized antiquity and Christianity in his work. The ecphrastic codes in Zaytsev’s ‘Pushkinian text’ visualize and reveal Pushkin’s “image” and the cultural and spiritual tradition behind it: Dostoevsky’s tradition in Pushkin’s understanding (“universal responsiveness”), which Zaytsev continues; Zaytsev’s own understanding (Pushkin as a harmonious Renaissance genius freely combining different cultures); the writer’s dialogue with the contemporary religious and philosophical thought of Russian emigration (N. A. Berdyaev, G. P. Fedotov). The result of Zaytsev’s ecphrastic strategies in the ‘Pushkinian text’ is the ontologization of Pushkin’s image, which makes him closer to the modern reader.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chertenko et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46aa631b076d99fa673aahttps://doi.org/10.15826/izv1.2025.31.3.043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper