PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2025Frontiers in Plant Science0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative assessment of species identification methods for European Salicornia sources: a multifaceted approach employing morphology, nuclear DNA content, phylogenetic markers, RNA topology, and SSR fingerprinting

View Full Paper
AFAndre FussySASamuele AustoniTWTraud Winkelmann

Key Points

  • ETS marker analysis provides a reliable and cost-effective method for Salicornia species determination.
  • SNP comparisons are more user-friendly for identifying species compared to phylogenetic trees.
  • Microsatellite markers can differentiate Salicornia subspecies based on fragment length differences.
  • DNA content estimation outperforms morphological methods for initial species identification.

Abstract

Accurate identification of Salicornia species is a fundamental prerequisite for their potential usability and domestication. This study utilized a multifaceted methodological approach integrating morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques to identify species from available European Salicornia sources. The following methods were compared: nuclear DNA content analysis; application of marker-based DNA barcoding via four common Salicornia markers; investigations of RNA topologies of these marker sequences by predicting theoretical secondary structures; utilization of diagnostic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions within the external transcribed spacer (ETS) marker sequences for European Salicornia taxa; comparison of three promising microsatellite (SSR) markers regarding their ability to differentiate Salicornia subspecies; and evaluation of morphological data on habitus and flower characteristics utilizing a Salicornia identification key. The results demonstrate that ETS marker analysis offers reliable and cost-effective species determination, with SNP comparisons being more user friendly than phylogenetic trees are, and microsatellite markers can be differentiated down to the subspecies level via fragment length differences. However, microsatellite analysis alone is not suitable for primary species identification. DNA content can provide a rough estimation of potential species and is already more reliable than morphological methods. The differentiation among species is crucial for creating transparency for farmers and consumers and for initiating breeding processes, particularly within the context of frequent misidentification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fussy et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46aae31b076d99fa67723https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1666009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Seed Traits as a Diagnostic Tool for Salicornioideae (Amaranthaceae): Development of a Dichotomous Identification Key2026
  2. 2CONFLICTING PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL BETWEEN NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA AND PLASTOME DATA AS EVIDENCE FOR HYBRID ORIGIN OF A TETRAPLOID MEMBER OF Salicornia (Amaranthaceae s.l.)2025
  3. 3Differential salinity responses between two Salicornia species are associated with distinct root exudate profiles in vitro2026
  4. 4Molecular analysis of the reactions in Salicornia europaea to varying NaCl concentrations at various stages of development to better exploit its potential as a new crop plant2024 · 12 citations
  5. 5DNA Barcoding and Allele-Specific PCR Discrimination of Glasswort Ecotypes from Apulia Region (Southern Italy)2026