PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2025Papers in Applied Geography0 citations

Assessment of the quality of life and determinants of life satisfaction & happiness level among the indigenous community of Indian Sundarban Biosphere Reserve

View Full Paper
SDShibu Das

Key Points

  • Life satisfaction and happiness levels vary significantly among indigenous households in the Sundarban region, indicating socio-economic disparities.
  • A principal component analysis identified major determinants of quality of life, focusing on aspects like education, income satisfaction, and gender.
  • Analyzing data from 300 households across 12 villages, the study utilized ordinal logistic regression to pinpoint 11 key factors affecting well-being.
  • Interventions based on these findings could enhance quality of life in underperforming regions, promoting regional well-being sustainably.

Abstract

This study evaluates the well-being-based Quality of Life Index at the C.D. block level and examines determinants of life satisfaction and happiness among 300 Indigenous agrarian households in 12 representative villages of different adaptation zones within the Indian Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, a fragile, agriculture-dependent region in Southeast Asia. Using a cross-sectional survey and multistage random sampling, the study focuses on four QOLI dimensions: Human Capital, Physical Capital, Financial Capital, and Housing Index, encompassing 25 indicators. By reducing the dimensionality of the dataset, principal component analysis was used to examine the major causes of QOLI. Ordinal logistic regression identifies 11 key factors influencing life satisfaction and happiness, including gender, age, education, ethnic group, housing type, landholding size, and satisfaction with income, living standards, and neighbors. Wide inter-block spatial variation has been observed among the four aspects of the quality-of-life index. The Kultali C.D. block received the lowest level of composite index, while the Haroa C.D. block received the maximum level of composite index. The findings emphasize the need for targeted policies to uplift blocks with low QOLI and enhance regional well-being. This approach can be applied at different scales in other parts of India and other developing nations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shibu Das (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46abb31b076d99fa67e25https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2025.2557920
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper