PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 21, 2025The International Journal of Robotics Research13 citationsOpen Access

The Oxford Spires Dataset: Benchmarking large-scale LiDAR-visual localisation, reconstruction and radiance field methods

View Full Paper
YTYifu TaoMMMiguel Ángel Muñoz-BañónLZLintong Zhang

Key Points

  • Evaluation shows that radiance field methods struggle to generalise to new poses, indicating a critical limitation.
  • Using Terrestrial LiDAR Scanner models as ground truth, reconstruction performance was inferior compared to Multi-view Stereo systems.
  • Localisation accuracy was achieved by aligning mobile LiDAR scans with robust TLS 3D models for effective evaluation.
  • Our dataset aims to enhance the integration of SLAM systems and radiance field methods for improved spatial understanding.

Abstract

This paper introduces a large-scale multi-modal dataset captured in and around well-known landmarks in Oxford using a custom-built multi-sensor perception unit as well as a millimetre-accurate map from a Terrestrial LiDAR Scanner (TLS). The perception unit includes three synchronised global shutter colour cameras, an automotive 3D LiDAR scanner, and an inertial sensor – all precisely calibrated. We also establish benchmarks for tasks involving localisation, reconstruction, and novel-view synthesis, which enable the evaluation of Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping (SLAM) methods, Structure-from-Motion (SfM) and Multi-view Stereo (MVS) methods as well as radiance field methods such as Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting. To evaluate 3D reconstruction, the TLS 3D models are used as ground truth. Localisation ground truth is computed by registering the mobile LiDAR scans to the TLS 3D models. Radiance field methods are evaluated not only with poses sampled from the input trajectory, but also from viewpoints that are from trajectories which are distant from the training poses. Our evaluation demonstrates a key limitation of state-of-the-art radiance field methods: we show that they tend to overfit to the training poses/images and do not generalise well to out-of-sequence poses. They also underperform in 3D reconstruction compared to MVS systems using the same visual inputs. Our dataset and benchmarks are intended to facilitate better integration of radiance field methods and SLAM systems. The raw and processed data, along with software for parsing and evaluation, can be accessed at https://dynamic.robots.ox.ac.uk/datasets/oxford-spires/ .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tao et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46ac231b076d99fa68316https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649251369905
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper